Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31484931›Full record

ArticleNature communications2019

Plant roots increase both decomposition and stable organic matter formation in boreal forest soil.

Bartosz Adamczyk, Outi-Maaria Sietiö, Petra Straková, Judith Prommer, Birgit Wild, Marleena Hagner, Mari Pihlatie, Hannu Fritze, Andreas Richter, Jussi Heinonsalo

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nature communications, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 27 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
27citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

27 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Beyond carbon flux partitioning: Carbon allocation and nonstructural carbon dynamics inferred from continuous fluxes.Ecological applications : a publication of the Ecological Society of America · 2022
    Article
  18. Metatranscriptomics captures dynamic shifts in mycorrhizal coordination in boreal forests.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2022
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Bartosz AdamczykDepartment of Agricultural Sciences, University of Helsinki, PO Box 66, Helsinki, Finland. bartosz.adamczyk@luke.fi.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4286-9508
Outi-Maaria SietiöInstitute for Atmospheric and Earth System Research (INAR), University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0127-9368
Petra StrakováNatural Resources Institute Finland, PL 2, 00791, Helsinki, Finland.
Judith PrommerDepartment of Microbiology and Ecosystem Science, University of Vienna, Althanstr. 14, 1090, Wien, Austria.
Birgit WildDepartment of Microbiology and Ecosystem Science, University of Vienna, Althanstr. 14, 1090, Wien, Austria.
Marleena HagnerNatural Resources Institute Finland, Tietotie 2, 31600, Jokioinen, Finland.
Mari PihlatieDepartment of Agricultural Sciences, University of Helsinki, PO Box 66, Helsinki, Finland.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6035-3949
Hannu FritzeNatural Resources Institute Finland, PL 2, 00791, Helsinki, Finland.
Andreas RichterDepartment of Microbiology and Ecosystem Science, University of Vienna, Althanstr. 14, 1090, Wien, Austria.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3282-4808
Jussi HeinonsaloDepartment of Agricultural Sciences, University of Helsinki, PO Box 66, Helsinki, Finland.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Boreal forests are ecosystems with low nitrogen (N) availability that store globally significant amounts of carbon (C), mainly in plant biomass and soil organic matter (SOM). Although crucial for future climate change predictions, the mechanisms controlling boreal C and N pools are not well understood. Here, using a three-year field experiment, we compare SOM decomposition and stabilization in the presence of roots, with exclusion of roots but presence of fungal hyphae and with exclusion of both roots and fungal hyphae. Roots accelerate SOM decomposition compared to the root exclusion treatments, but also promote a different soil N economy with higher concentrations of organic soil N compared to inorganic soil N accompanied with the build-up of stable SOM-N. In contrast, root exclusion leads to an inorganic soil N economy (i.e., high level of inorganic N) with reduced stable SOM-N build-up. Based on our findings, we provide a framework on how plant roots affect SOM decomposition and stabilization.

Indexed as

EcosystemTaigaBiomassCarbonHyphaeModels, BiologicalNitrogenOrganic ChemicalsPlant RootsPlantsSoilSoil MicrobiologyCarbonNitrogenOrganic ChemicalsSoil

Identifiers

PMID31484931
PMCPMC6726645

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.