Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31484795›Full record

SynthesisBioscience reports2019

Clinical value of a plasma Epstein-Barr virus DNA assay in the diagnosis of recurrent or metastatic nasopharyngeal carcinoma: a meta-analysis.

Haiqin Peng, Zhanzhan Li, Yujiao Long, Jiahui Li, Zhiyuan Liu, Rongrong Zhou

Open access · goldAbstract readMeta-Analysis
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Bioscience reports, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
1.8field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 18 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. SEOM-TTCC clinical guideline for nasopharyngeal carcinoma (update 2025).Clinical & translational oncology : official publication of the Federation of Spanish Oncology Societies and of the National Cancer Institute of Mexico · 2026
    Guideline
  2. SEOM-TTCC clinical guideline in nasopharynx cancer (2021).Clinical & translational oncology : official publication of the Federation of Spanish Oncology Societies and of the National Cancer Institute of Mexico · 2022
    Guideline
  3. Pooled it
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Haiqin PengDepartment of Oncology, Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha 410008, China.
Zhanzhan LiDepartment of Oncology, Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha 410008, China.ORCID 0000-0001-9256-728X
Yujiao LongDepartment of Oncology, Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha 410008, China.
Jiahui LiDepartment of Oncology, Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha 410008, China.
Zhiyuan LiuDepartment of Oncology, Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha 410008, China.
Rongrong ZhouDepartment of Oncology, Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha 410008, China 664990095@qq.com.ORCID 0000-0002-3233-748X
Central South University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundTo evaluate the diagnostic value of Epstein-Barr virus (EBV) DNA in nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC) patients with locoregional or distant recurrence.

methodsArticles related to the diagnosis of recurrent or metastatic NPC by the detection of EBV DNA in plasma or serum were retrieved from different databases. Sensitivity, specificity, summary receiver operating characteristic (SROC) curves, and likelihood ratios were pooled to assess the diagnostic value of individual diagnostic tests.

resultsThis meta-analysis pooled 25 eligible studies including 2496 patients with NPC. The sensitivity, specificity, positive likelihood ratio (+LR), and negative likelihood ratio (-LR) of EBV DNA in the diagnosis of NPC were 0.858 (95% confidence interval (CI): 0.801-0.901), 0.890 (95% CI: 0.866-0.909), 7.782 (95% CI: 6.423-9.429) and 0.159 (95% CI: 0.112-0.226), respectively. The diagnostic odds ratio (DOR) was 48.865 (95% CI: 31.903-74.845). The SROC for EBV DNA detection was 0.93 (95% CI: 0.90-0.95).

conclusionThe detection of EBV DNA for the diagnosis of recurrent or metastatic NPC has good sensitivity and specificity and might be helpful in monitoring recurrent or metastatic NPC.

Indexed as

DNA, ViralEpstein-Barr Virus InfectionsFemaleHerpesvirus 4, HumanHumansMaleNasopharyngeal CarcinomaNeoplasm MetastasisNeoplasm Recurrence, LocalDNA, ViralEpstein-Barr Virus DNAMeta-Analysismetastaticnasopharyngeal carcinomarecurrent

Identifiers

PMID31484795
PMCPMC6753325
OpenAlexW2971974885

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.