Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31484761›Full record

ArticleProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America2019

Joanna F D Hagen, Cláudia C Mendes, Amber Blogg, Alexander Payne, Kentaro M Tanaka, Pedro Gaspar, Javier Figueras Jimenez, Maike Kittelmann, Alistair P McGregor, Maria D S Nunes

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
6.8field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 37 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. A developmental atlas of male terminalia across twelve species ofFrontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2024
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Resolving between novelty and homology in the rapidly evolving phallus of Drosophila.Journal of experimental zoology. Part B, Molecular and developmental evolution · 2023
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Joanna F D HagenDepartment of Biological and Medical Sciences, Oxford Brookes University, OX3 0BP Oxford, United Kingdom.
Cláudia C MendesDepartment of Biological and Medical Sciences, Oxford Brookes University, OX3 0BP Oxford, United Kingdom.
Amber BloggDepartment of Biological and Medical Sciences, Oxford Brookes University, OX3 0BP Oxford, United Kingdom.
Alexander PayneDepartment of Biological and Medical Sciences, Oxford Brookes University, OX3 0BP Oxford, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0002-1962-3019
Kentaro M TanakaDepartment of Biological and Medical Sciences, Oxford Brookes University, OX3 0BP Oxford, United Kingdom.
Pedro GasparDepartment of Biological and Medical Sciences, Oxford Brookes University, OX3 0BP Oxford, United Kingdom.
Javier Figueras JimenezDepartment of Biological and Medical Sciences, Oxford Brookes University, OX3 0BP Oxford, United Kingdom.
Maike KittelmannDepartment of Biological and Medical Sciences, Oxford Brookes University, OX3 0BP Oxford, United Kingdom.
Alistair P McGregorDepartment of Biological and Medical Sciences, Oxford Brookes University, OX3 0BP Oxford, United Kingdom; amcgregor@brookes.ac.uk msantos-nunes@brookes.ac.uk.ORCID 0000-0002-2908-2420
Maria D S NunesDepartment of Biological and Medical Sciences, Oxford Brookes University, OX3 0BP Oxford, United Kingdom; amcgregor@brookes.ac.uk msantos-nunes@brookes.ac.uk.
Oxford Brookes University · GB

Funding

Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council BB/M020967/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Male genital structures are among the most rapidly evolving morphological traits and are often the only features that can distinguish closely related species. This process is thought to be driven by sexual selection and may reinforce species separation. However, while the genetic bases of many phenotypic differences have been identified, we still lack knowledge about the genes underlying evolutionary differences in male genital organs and organ size more generally. The claspers (surstyli) are periphallic structures that play an important role in copulation in insects. Here, we show that divergence in clasper size and bristle number between

Indexed as

Biological EvolutionAnimalsDrosophila melanogasterDrosophila ProteinsFemaleGene Expression ProfilingGene Expression RegulationGenitalia, MaleMaleMembrane ProteinsOrgan SizePhenotypeDrosophila ProteinsMembrane Proteinstrn protein, DrosophiladevelopmentDrosophilaevolutiongeneticsgenitalia

Identifiers

PMID31484761
PMCPMC6754542
OpenAlexW2972002998

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.