Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31484737›Full record

ArticlemSphere2019

Experimental Mouse Models of Disseminated Candida auris Infection.

Hong Xin, Farhan Mohiuddin, Jensen Tran, Abby Adams, Karen Eberle

Open access · goldAbstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in mSphere, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 49 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
49citing papers in PubMed
4.5field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

49 citing papers in PubMed, 64 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. RethinkingVaccines · 2026
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Microbiology spectrum · 2026
    Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. From Bench to Body: ProtectiveJournal of cellular immunology · 2025
    Article
  15. ThemBio · 2024
    Article
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Innate immune response to Candida auris.Current opinion in microbiology · 2024
    Review
  19. Article
  20. Comprehensive Overview ofJournal of microbiology and biotechnology · 2024
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Hong XinLSU Health Sciences Center New Orleans, New Orleans, Louisiana, USA hxin@lsuhsc.edu.
Farhan MohiuddinLoyola University New Orleans, New Orleans, Louisiana, USA.
Jensen TranLoyola University New Orleans, New Orleans, Louisiana, USA.
Abby AdamsLSU Health Sciences Center New Orleans, New Orleans, Louisiana, USA.
Karen EberleLSU Health Sciences Center New Orleans, New Orleans, Louisiana, USA.
Louisiana State University Health Sciences Center New Orleans · USLoyola University New Orleans · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Disseminated candidiasis is a life-threatening disease and remains the most common bloodstream infection in hospitalized patients in the United States. Despite the availability of modern antifungal therapy, crude mortality in the last decade has remained unacceptably high. In particular,

Indexed as

Disease Models, AnimalHost-Pathogen InteractionsAnimalsCandidaCandidiasisComplement C5HumansLeukocyte ElastaseMiceMice, Inbred AMice, Inbred BALB CMice, Inbred C57BLMice, KnockoutPreliminary DataVirulenceComplement C5Leukocyte ElastaseCandidaCandida auriscandidiasiscomplementdisseminated candidiasisimmunocompromised hostsmouse modelsneutrophil elastase (NE)

Identifiers

PMID31484737
PMCPMC6731527
OpenAlexW2971464810

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.