Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31484665›Full record

ReviewEuropean respiratory review : an official journal of the European Respiratory Society2019

The microbiome in bronchiectasis.

Hollian Richardson, Alison J Dicker, Heather Barclay, James D Chalmers

Open access · diamondAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in European respiratory review : an official journal of the European Respiratory Society, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 60 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
60citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
8.7field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

60 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 148 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Eradication treatment forEuropean respiratory review : an official journal of the European Respiratory Society · 2024
    Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Pulmonary infection byFrontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2026
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. European respiratory review : an official journal of the European Respiratory Society · 2025
    Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Hollian RichardsonScottish Centre for Respiratory Research, University of Dundee, Dundee, UK.
Alison J DickerScottish Centre for Respiratory Research, University of Dundee, Dundee, UK.
Heather BarclayScottish Centre for Respiratory Research, University of Dundee, Dundee, UK.
James D ChalmersScottish Centre for Respiratory Research, University of Dundee, Dundee, UK j.chalmers@dundee.ac.uk.
University of Dundee · GB

Funding

Chief Scientist Office SCAF/17/03
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Bronchiectasis is increasing in prevalence worldwide, yet current treatments available are limited to those alleviating symptoms and reducing exacerbations. The pathogenesis of the disease and the inflammatory, infective and molecular drivers of disease progression are not fully understood, making the development of novel treatments challenging. Understanding the role bacteria play in disease progression has been enhanced by the use of next-generation sequencing techniques such as 16S rRNA sequencing. The microbiome has not been extensively studied in bronchiectasis, but existing data show lung bacterial communities dominated by

Indexed as

MicrobiotaAnimalsAnti-Bacterial AgentsBronchiectasisDisease ProgressionHaemophilusHost-Pathogen InteractionsHumansLungPseudomonasRisk FactorsStreptococcusAnti-Bacterial Agents

Identifiers

PMID31484665
PMCPMC9489022
OpenAlexW2971653306

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.