Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31484550›Full record

ReviewJournal for immunotherapy of cancer2019

Reactivation of tuberculosis in cancer patients following administration of immune checkpoint inhibitors: current evidence and clinical practice recommendations.

Amalia Anastasopoulou, Dimitrios C Ziogas, Michael Samarkos, John M Kirkwood, Helen Gogas

Open access · goldAbstract readCase ReportsReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal for immunotherapy of cancer, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 66 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
66citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
8.0field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

66 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 122 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Guideline
  5. Trial
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Challenges of tuberculosis in cancer patients: insights from two hospitals in Madrid.Clinical & translational oncology : official publication of the Federation of Spanish Oncology Societies and of the National Cancer Institute of Mexico · 2026
    Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Microbial Clearance of RefractoryPharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. CD14Frontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2025
    Article
  20. Article

6 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Amalia AnastasopoulouFirst Department of Medicine, Laiko General Hospital, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens School of Medicine, 11527, Athens, Greece.
Dimitrios C ZiogasFirst Department of Medicine, Laiko General Hospital, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens School of Medicine, 11527, Athens, Greece.
Michael SamarkosFirst Department of Medicine, Laiko General Hospital, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens School of Medicine, 11527, Athens, Greece.
John M KirkwoodDivision of Hematology/Oncology, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, PA, 15213, USA.
Helen GogasFirst Department of Medicine, Laiko General Hospital, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens School of Medicine, 11527, Athens, Greece. helgogas@gmail.com.
Laiko General Hospital of Athens · GRNational and Kapodistrian University of Athens · GRUniversity of Pittsburgh · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICBs) have revolutionized cancer treatment producing remarkable and durable responses for a range of malignancies. However, the additional modulation of immune response by ICBs may rarely cause immune-related infectious complications, including re-activation of latent tuberculosis infection (LTBC) with detrimental effects on those patients' outcome. Here, we present two "real-world" melanoma cases that were treated in our department with blockade of PD-1/PD-L1 and developed active Mycobacterium tuberculosis (MTB) during immunotherapy. In view of these cases, we review the literature for ICB-associated MTB reactivation and discuss our considerations about the possible interactions of immunotherapy and the underlying co-existent mycobacterial infection. Based on the current evidence from preclinical findings prior to this experience, we raise questions regarding cancer patients who are at higher risk for developing MTB infection, whether ICB-treated patients should be considered immunocompromised, and how they should be managed for latent and/or active tuberculosis. Aside from the well-established clinical benefit of immunotherapy, the blockade of PD-1/PD-L1 axis may concurrently disrupt the immune control of specific opportunistic infections such as tuberculosis that should be carefully and expectantly managed in order to avoid compromising the outcome of cancer treatment and the affected patient's survival.

Indexed as

AgedAged, 80 and overAntineoplastic Agents, ImmunologicalB7-H1 AntigenCTLA-4 AntigenFemaleHumansMaleMelanomaMycobacterium tuberculosisPractice Guidelines as TopicSkin NeoplasmsTuberculosisVirus ActivationAntineoplastic Agents, ImmunologicalB7-H1 AntigenCD274 protein, humanCTLA-4 AntigenCancerImmune checkpoint inhibitorsImmunotherapyTuberculosis

Identifiers

PMID31484550
PMCPMC6727332
OpenAlexW2971943438

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.