Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31484512›Full record

ArticleBMC public health2019

The health literacy questionnaire among the aged in Changsha, China: confirmatory factor analysis.

Yiwei Huang, Tingting Ruan, Qiaoyun Yi, Tingting Wang, Zhihua Guo

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC public health, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Developing a validity testing plan for a patient-reported outcome measure in a new context using the argument-based approach to validity.Quality of life research : an international journal of quality of life aspects of treatment, care and rehabilitation · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Awareness of diagnosis, treatment and risk of late effects in Chinese survivors of childhood cancer in Hong Kong.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2021
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Yiwei HuangXiangya School of Nursing, Central South University, Changsha, Hunan, People's Republic of China.
Tingting RuanXiangya School of Nursing, Central South University, Changsha, Hunan, People's Republic of China.
Qiaoyun YiXiangya School of Nursing, Central South University, Changsha, Hunan, People's Republic of China. 2269086514@qq.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9375-5960
Tingting WangXiangya School of Nursing, Central South University, Changsha, Hunan, People's Republic of China.
Zhihua GuoXiangya School of Nursing, Central South University, Changsha, Hunan, People's Republic of China.

Funding

Hunan Provincial Science and Technology Department Science and Technology Innovation Platform and Talent Plan 2017TP1004
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundHealth literacy is defined as the cognitive and social skills that determine the motivation and ability of individuals to gain access to, understand and use information in ways that promote and maintain good health. A Health Literacy Questionnaire (HLQ) is a toolkit with good reliability and validity. Accordingly, this study administered HLQ among older adults in China to examine its factor structure, reliability, homogeneity, and discriminant validity for use in understanding better the health literacy of older adults and determining corresponding measures.

methodsPsychometric properties were examined based on the data collected via face-to-face interviews (N = 343). Tests included the difficulty level, composite scale reliability, confirmatory factor analysis (CFA), and Bayesian structural equation modeling (BSEM).

resultsThe easiest scale to obtain a high score was "Social support for health" and the hardest, "Navigating the health care system" and "Appraisal of health information." Two one-factor models fitted well with no correlated residuals allowed. After model modification, the CFA fit statistics of the other seven scales were good. All HLQ scales were found to be homogenous, with a composite reliability ranging from 0.74 to 0.85. The nine-factor Bayesian structural equation model fitted the data well (Posterior-Predictive-P value = 0.670; 95% Confidence Interval for the difference between the observed and replicated Chi-square values = - 163.320, 102.750).

conclusionsThe Chinese version of the HLQ has strong construct and content validity and high composite reliability when applied to older adults in Changsha City, China. Therefore, the nine-scale HLQ can now be administered to Chinese older adults, thereby providing a powerful approach to understanding the multidimensional area of health literacy.

Indexed as

Surveys and QuestionnairesAgedBayes TheoremChinaCross-Sectional StudiesFactor Analysis, StatisticalHealth LiteracyHumansMiddle AgedPsychometricsReproducibility of ResultsBayesian structural equation modelingBSEMHealth literacyHLQPsychometricQuestionnaire

Identifiers

PMID31484512
PMCPMC6727331

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.