ArticleAnimals : an open access journal from MDPI2019
Transcriptome Analysis of the Effects of Fasting Caecotrophy on Hepatic Lipid Metabolism in New Zealand Rabbits.
Article in Animals : an open access journal from MDPI, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed, 17 citations in OpenAlex.
- Proteomic responses to the effect of coprophagy prevention on meat quality in New Zealand white rabbits.Food chemistry. Molecular sciences · 2026Article
- Biomarkers of Adipose Color: A Multi-Omics Analysis Unravels the Molecular Landscape of White and Yellow Fat in Kazakh Horse.Biology · 2026Article
- Coprophagy prevention interfered with intestinal barrier, lipid metabolism, and immune performance in rabbits via microbe-gut-liver axis.Animal microbiome · 2025Article
- Untargeted Metabolomics to Harness Ideal Protein Concept and Mitigate Environmental Impact in Rabbit Models.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025Article
- Article
- Impact of coprophagy prevention on the growth performance, serum biochemistry, and intestinal microbiome of rabbits.BMC microbiology · 2023Article
- Screening and stability analysis of reference genes in fasting caecotrophy model in rabbits.Molecular biology reports · 2022Article
- Coprophagy Prevention Affects the Reproductive Performance in New Zealand White Rabbits Is Mediated through Nox4-ROS-NFOxidative medicine and cellular longevity · 2022Article
- Coprophagy Prevention Decreases the Reproductive Performance and Granulosa Cell ApoptosisFrontiers in physiology · 2022Article
- Study on <em>CCDC69</em> interfering with the prognosis of patients with breast cancer through PPAR signal pathway.European journal of histochemistry : EJH · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
Abstract
In order to investigate the effects of fasting caecotrophy on hepatic lipid metabolism in rabbits, 12 weaned female New Zealand white rabbits were randomly divided into (n = 6/group) a control and fasting caecotrophy group. Rabbits in the experimental group were treated with an Elizabeth circle to prevent them from eating their own soft feces for a 60-day period. Growth and blood biochemical indices, transcriptome sequencing and histology analysis of the liver were performed. Compared with the control group, final weight, weight gain, liver weight, growth rate and feed conversion ratio, all decreased in the experimental group (p < 0.05). RNA sequencing (RNA-seq) analysis revealed a total of 301.2 million raw reads (approximately 45.06 Gb of high-quality clean data) that were mapped to the rabbit genome. After a five-step filtering process, 14,964 genes were identified, including 444 differentially expressed genes (p < 0.05, foldchange ≥ 1). A number of differently expressed genes linked to lipid metabolism were further analyzed including
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.