Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31484366›Full record

ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2019

Detecting Moments of Stress from Measurements of Wearable Physiological Sensors.

Kalliopi Kyriakou, Bernd Resch, Günther Sagl, Andreas Petutschnig, Christian Werner, David Niederseer, Michael Liedlgruber, Frank Wilhelm, Tess Osborne, Jessica Pykett

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 59 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
59citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
22.6field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

59 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 228 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 5 institutions in 5 countries.

Kalliopi KyriakouDepartment of Geoinformatics, University of Salzburg, 5020 Salzburg, Austria. kalliopi.kyriakou@sbg.ac.at.
Bernd ReschCenter for Geographic Analysis, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA 02138, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-2233-6926
Günther SaglDepartment of Geoinformatics, University of Salzburg, 5020 Salzburg, Austria.
Andreas PetutschnigDepartment of Geoinformatics, University of Salzburg, 5020 Salzburg, Austria.ORCID 0000-0001-5029-2425
Christian WernerDepartment of Geoinformatics, University of Salzburg, 5020 Salzburg, Austria.ORCID 0000-0001-9406-9284
David NiederseerDepartment of Cardiology, University Hospital Zurich, 8091 Zurich, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0003-3089-1222
Michael LiedlgruberDepartment of Psychology, University of Salzburg, 5020 Salzburg, Austria.
Frank WilhelmDepartment of Psychology, University of Salzburg, 5020 Salzburg, Austria.
Tess OsborneDepartment of Demography, Faculty of Spatial Sciences, University of Groningen, PO Box 800, 9700 AV Groningen, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0003-3323-8237
Jessica PykettSchool of Geography, Earth and Environmental Sciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham B15 2TT, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-0036-9639
University of Salzburg · ATHarvard University · USUniversity Hospital of Zurich · CHUniversity of Birmingham · GBUniversity of Groningen · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

There is a rich repertoire of methods for stress detection using various physiological signals and algorithms. However, there is still a gap in research efforts moving from laboratory studies to real-world settings. A small number of research has verified when a physiological response is a reaction to an extrinsic stimulus of the participant's environment in real-world settings. Typically, physiological signals are correlated with the spatial characteristics of the physical environment, supported by video records or interviews. The present research aims to bridge the gap between laboratory settings and real-world field studies by introducing a new algorithm that leverages the capabilities of wearable physiological sensors to detect moments of stress (MOS). We propose a rule-based algorithm based on galvanic skin response and skin temperature, combing empirical findings with expert knowledge to ensure transferability between laboratory settings and real-world field studies. To verify our algorithm, we carried out a laboratory experiment to create a "gold standard" of physiological responses to stressors. We validated the algorithm in real-world field studies using a mixed-method approach by spatially correlating the participant's perceived stress, geo-located questionnaires, and the corresponding real-world situation from the video. Results show that the algorithm detects MOS with 84% accuracy, showing high correlations between measured (by wearable sensors), reported (by questionnaires and eDiary entries), and recorded (by video) stress events. The urban stressors that were identified in the real-world studies originate from traffic congestion, dangerous driving situations, and crowded areas such as tourist attractions. The presented research can enhance stress detection in real life and may thus foster a better understanding of circumstances that bring about physiological stress in humans.

Indexed as

Wearable Electronic DevicesAlgorithmsHumansStress, Physiologicalperceived stressphysiological wearable sensorsreal-world field studiesrule-based algorithmstress detection

Identifiers

PMID31484366
PMCPMC6749249
OpenAlexW2971526326

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.