Trial reportDigestive endoscopy : official journal of the Japan Gastroenterological Endoscopy Society2020
Standing-type magnetically guided capsule endoscopy versus gastroscopy for gastric examination: multicenter blinded comparative trial.
Trial report in Digestive endoscopy : official journal of the Japan Gastroenterological Endoscopy Society, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06848400 (A Multicenter, Prospective Study of Capsule Gastric Endoscopy for Gastric Disease Screening in Simulated Home Scenarios), which is not on this map. Cited by 14 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
A Multicenter, Prospective Study of Capsule Gastric Endoscopy for Gastric Disease Screening in Simulated Home Scenarios
Who cites it
14 citing papers in PubMed, 34 citations in OpenAlex.
- Review of Gastrointestinal Capsule Robots: Materials, Actuation, Diagnostics, and Therapeutics.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2026Review
- Application of artificial intelligence for detection of Helicobacter pylori infection by magnetically controlled capsule endoscopy.Surgical endoscopy · 2026Article
- Magnetically guided gastric capsule endoscopy: a review and new developments.Clinical endoscopy · 2025Review
- Feasibility and Safety of a Novel Cable-Transmitted Magnetically Controlled Capsule Endoscopy System for Upper Gastrointestinal Examination.Health care science · 2025Article
- Feasibility and safety of a cable transmission magnetically controlled capsule endoscopy system for examination of the human upper digestive tract.Saudi medical journal · 2024Article
- Positioning exercises in improving the quality of magnetic-controlled capsule endoscopy.BMC gastroenterology · 2024Article
- Optimal Motion Control of a Capsule Endoscope in the Stomach Utilizing a Magnetic Navigation System with Dual Permanent Magnets.Micromachines · 2024Article
- Capsule endoscopy and panendoscopy: A journey to the future of gastrointestinal endoscopy.World journal of gastroenterology · 2024Article
- A systematic review on diagnosis and treatment of gastrointestinal diseases by magnetically controlled capsule endoscopy and artificial intelligence.Therapeutic advances in gastroenterology · 2023Review
- Magnetically Guided Capsule Endoscopy and Magnetic Resonance Enterography in Children With Crohn's Disease: Manifestations and the Value of Assessing Disease Activity.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2022Article
- Capsule Endoscopy for Gastric Evaluation.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021Review
- Screening for gastric cancer in China: Advances, challenges and visions.Chinese journal of cancer research = Chung-kuo yen cheng yen chiu · 2021Article
- Development and Application of Magnetically Controlled Capsule Endoscopy in Detecting Gastric Lesions.Gastroenterology research and practice · 2021Review
- Frontiers of Robotic Gastroscopy: A Comprehensive Review of Robotic Gastroscopes and Technologies.Cancers · 2020Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
aimTo compare feasibility and safety after gastrointestinal checkup by standing-type magnetically controlled capsule endoscopy (SMCE) and conventional gastroscopy.
methodsThis was a prospective multicenter, blinded study that compared SMCE with gastroscopy in patients from April 2018 to July 2018. All patients first underwent SMCE and then subsequently had gastroscopy with i.v. anesthesia. We calculated the compliance rates of gastric lesion detection by SMCE using gastroscopy as the standard. Capsule retention rate, incidence of adverse events, and patient satisfaction were documented throughout the study.
resultsOne hundred and sixty-one patients who completed SMCE and gastroscopy were included in the analysis. Positive compliance rate among SMCE and gastroscopy was 92.0% (95% CI: 80.77%-97.78%). Negative compliance rate was 95.5% (89.80%, 98.52%). Moreover, overall compliance rate was 94.41% (89.65%, 97.41%). Sixty-four pathological outcomes were identified. Of these 64 outcomes, 50 were detected by both procedures. The gastroscopy method neglected seven findings (such as five erosions, one polyp, and one ulcer). Furthermore, SMCE also overlooked seven lesions (i.e. one erosion, two polyps, one atrophy, and three submucosal tumors). Capsule retention or related adverse events were not reported.
conclusionStanding-type magnetically controlled capsule endoscopy provides equivalent agreement with gastroscopy and may be useful for screening of gastric illnesses without any anesthesia.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.