ArticlePLoS computational biology2019
Integrating thermodynamic and sequence contexts improves protein-RNA binding prediction.
Article in PLoS computational biology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed.
- A systematic benchmark of machine learning methods for protein-RNA interaction prediction.Briefings in bioinformatics · 2023Article
- Modeling CRISPR-Cas13d on-target and off-target effects using machine learning approaches.Nature communications · 2023Article
- qNABpredict: Quick, accurate, and taxonomy-aware sequence-based prediction of content of nucleic acid binding amino acids.Protein science : a publication of the Protein Society · 2023Article
- ResidualBind: Uncovering Sequence-Structure Preferences of RNA-Binding Proteins with Deep Neural Networks.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2023Article
- PRIESSTESS: interpretable, high-performing models of the sequence and structure preferences of RNA-binding proteins.Nucleic acids research · 2022Article
- Prediction of evolutionary constraint by genomic annotations improves functional prioritization of genomic variants in maize.Genome biology · 2022Article
- RNANetMotif: Identifying sequence-structure RNA network motifs in RNA-protein binding sites.PLoS computational biology · 2022Article
- EnANNDeep: An Ensemble-based lncRNA-protein Interaction Prediction Framework with Adaptive k-Nearest Neighbor Classifier and Deep Models.Interdisciplinary sciences, computational life sciences · 2022Article
- Protein-RNA interaction prediction with deep learning: structure matters.Briefings in bioinformatics · 2022Article
- Multi-resBind: a residual network-based multi-label classifier for in vivo RNA binding prediction and preference visualization.BMC bioinformatics · 2021Article
- Global importance analysis: An interpretability method to quantify importance of genomic features in deep neural networks.PLoS computational biology · 2021Article
- A deep learning model for plant lncRNA-protein interaction prediction with graph attention.Molecular genetics and genomics : MGG · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Predicting RNA-binding protein (RBP) specificity is important for understanding gene expression regulation and RNA-mediated enzymatic processes. It is widely believed that RBP binding specificity is determined by both the sequence and structural contexts of RNAs. Existing approaches, including traditional machine learning algorithms and more recently, deep learning models, have been extensively applied to integrate RNA sequence and its predicted or experimental RNA structural probabilities for improving the accuracy of RBP binding prediction. Such models were trained mostly on the large-scale in vitro datasets, such as the RNAcompete dataset. However, in RNAcompete, most synthetic RNAs are unstructured, which makes machine learning methods not effectively extract RBP-binding structural preferences. Furthermore, RNA structure may be variable or multi-modal according to both theoretical and experimental evidence. In this work, we propose ThermoNet, a thermodynamic prediction model by integrating a new sequence-embedding convolutional neural network model over a thermodynamic ensemble of RNA secondary structures. First, the sequence-embedding convolutional neural network generalizes the existing k-mer based methods by jointly learning convolutional filters and k-mer embeddings to represent RNA sequence contexts. Second, the thermodynamic average of deep-learning predictions is able to explore structural variability and improves the prediction, especially for the structured RNAs. Extensive experiments demonstrate that our method significantly outperforms existing approaches, including RCK, DeepBind and several other recent state-of-the-art methods for predictions on both in vitro and in vivo data. The implementation of ThermoNet is available at https://github.com/suyufeng/ThermoNet.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.