Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31483764›Full record

ArticleInvestigative radiology2019

Computer-Aided Diagnosis of Pulmonary Fibrosis Using Deep Learning and CT Images.

Andreas Christe, Alan A Peters, Dionysios Drakopoulos, Johannes T Heverhagen, Thomas Geiser, Thomai Stathopoulou, Stergios Christodoulidis, Marios Anthimopoulos, Stavroula G Mougiakakou, Lukas Ebner

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Investigative radiology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 58 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
58citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

58 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Radiomics and Artificial Intelligence in Pulmonary Fibrosis.Journal of imaging informatics in medicine · 2025
    Review
  6. Review
  7. Computer-Aided Evaluation of Interstitial Lung Diseases.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025
    Review
  8. Observational
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Digital health delivery in respiratory medicine: adjunct, replacement or cause for division?European respiratory review : an official journal of the European Respiratory Society · 2024
    Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Andreas ChristeFrom the Departments of Diagnostic, Interventional, and Pediatric Radiology.
Alan A PetersFrom the Departments of Diagnostic, Interventional, and Pediatric Radiology.
Dionysios DrakopoulosFrom the Departments of Diagnostic, Interventional, and Pediatric Radiology.
Johannes T HeverhagenFrom the Departments of Diagnostic, Interventional, and Pediatric Radiology.
Thomas GeiserPulmonology, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, University of Bern.
Thomai StathopoulouARTORG Center for Biomedical Engineering Research, Bern University, Bern, Switzerland.
Stergios ChristodoulidisARTORG Center for Biomedical Engineering Research, Bern University, Bern, Switzerland.
Marios AnthimopoulosARTORG Center for Biomedical Engineering Research, Bern University, Bern, Switzerland.
Stavroula G MougiakakouARTORG Center for Biomedical Engineering Research, Bern University, Bern, Switzerland.
Lukas EbnerFrom the Departments of Diagnostic, Interventional, and Pediatric Radiology.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesThe objective of this study is to assess the performance of a computer-aided diagnosis (CAD) system (INTACT system) for the automatic classification of high-resolution computed tomography images into 4 radiological diagnostic categories and to compare this with the performance of radiologists on the same task. MATERIALS AND

methodsFor the comparison, a total of 105 cases of pulmonary fibrosis were studied (54 cases of nonspecific interstitial pneumonia and 51 cases of usual interstitial pneumonia). All diagnoses were interstitial lung disease board consensus diagnoses (radiologically or histologically proven cases) and were retrospectively selected from our database. Two subspecialized chest radiologists made a consensual ground truth radiological diagnosis, according to the Fleischner Society recommendations. A comparison analysis was performed between the INTACT system and 2 other radiologists with different years of experience (readers 1 and 2). The INTACT system consists of a sequential pipeline in which first the anatomical structures of the lung are segmented, then the various types of pathological lung tissue are identified and characterized, and this information is then fed to a random forest classifier able to recommend a radiological diagnosis.

resultsReader 1, reader 2, and INTACT achieved similar accuracy for classifying pulmonary fibrosis into the original 4 categories: 0.6, 0.54, and 0.56, respectively, with P > 0.45. The INTACT system achieved an F-score (harmonic mean for precision and recall) of 0.56, whereas the 2 readers, on average, achieved 0.57 (P = 0.991). For the pooled classification (2 groups, with and without the need for biopsy), reader 1, reader 2, and CAD had similar accuracies of 0.81, 0.70, and 0.81, respectively. The F-score was again similar for the CAD system and the radiologists. The CAD system and the average reader reached F-scores of 0.80 and 0.79 (P = 0.898).

conclusionsWe found that a computer-aided detection algorithm based on machine learning was able to classify idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis with similar accuracy to a human reader.

Indexed as

Deep LearningAgedAged, 80 and overAlgorithmsBiopsyDiagnosis, Computer-AssistedFemaleHumansImage Interpretation, Computer-AssistedLungMaleMiddle AgedPulmonary FibrosisReproducibility of ResultsRetrospective StudiesSensitivity and Specificity

Identifiers

PMID31483764
PMCPMC6738634

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.