ArticleInvestigative radiology2019
Computer-Aided Diagnosis of Pulmonary Fibrosis Using Deep Learning and CT Images.
Article in Investigative radiology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 58 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
58 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Diagnosis accuracy of machine learning for idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis.European journal of medical research · 2025Pooled it
- The value of imaging and clinical outcomes in a phase II clinical trial of a lysophosphatidic acid receptor antagonist in idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis.Therapeutic advances in respiratory diseaseTrial
- Automated Detection and Classification of Pleural Effusion on Computed Tomography Using Deep Learning.Journal of imaging informatics in medicine · 2026Article
- Reprogrammed Fibrotic Niche Fuels Lung Cancer Initiation and Reciprocal Remodeling.International journal of biological sciences · 2026Review
- Radiomics and Artificial Intelligence in Pulmonary Fibrosis.Journal of imaging informatics in medicine · 2025Review
- Diagnosis of early idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis: current status and future perspective.Respiratory research · 2025Review
- Computer-Aided Evaluation of Interstitial Lung Diseases.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- Evaluation of respiratory muscle dysfunction in patients with idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis: a prospective observational study with magnetic resonance imaging.BMC pulmonary medicine · 2025Observational
- Evolving and Novel Applications of Artificial Intelligence in Thoracic Imaging.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Review
- Article
- [Using Artificial Intelligence Software for Diagnosing Emphysema and Interstitial Lung Disease].Journal of the Korean Society of Radiology · 2024Review
- Digital health delivery in respiratory medicine: adjunct, replacement or cause for division?European respiratory review : an official journal of the European Respiratory Society · 2024Review
- Detection method of viral pneumonia imaging features based on CT scan images in COVID-19 case study.MethodsX · 2024Article
- Article
- Analysis of Validation Performance of a Machine Learning Classifier in Interstitial Lung Disease Cases Without Definite or Probable Usual Interstitial Pneumonia Pattern on CT Using Clinical and Pathology-Supported Diagnostic Labels.Journal of imaging informatics in medicine · 2024Article
- Assessment of lung deformation in patients with idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis with elastic registration technique on pulmonary three-dimensional ultrashort echo time MRI.Insights into imaging · 2024Article
- Chronic Lung Injury after COVID-19 Pneumonia: Clinical, Radiologic, and Histopathologic Perspectives.Radiology · 2024Review
- Longitudinal x-ray based lung function measurement for monitoring Nintedanib treatment response in a mouse model of lung fibrosis.Scientific reports · 2023Article
- Recent Advances of Artificial Intelligence Applications in Interstitial Lung Diseases.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Review
- Implementation of artificial intelligence in thoracic imaging-a what, how, and why guide from the European Society of Thoracic Imaging (ESTI).European radiology · 2023Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectivesThe objective of this study is to assess the performance of a computer-aided diagnosis (CAD) system (INTACT system) for the automatic classification of high-resolution computed tomography images into 4 radiological diagnostic categories and to compare this with the performance of radiologists on the same task. MATERIALS AND
methodsFor the comparison, a total of 105 cases of pulmonary fibrosis were studied (54 cases of nonspecific interstitial pneumonia and 51 cases of usual interstitial pneumonia). All diagnoses were interstitial lung disease board consensus diagnoses (radiologically or histologically proven cases) and were retrospectively selected from our database. Two subspecialized chest radiologists made a consensual ground truth radiological diagnosis, according to the Fleischner Society recommendations. A comparison analysis was performed between the INTACT system and 2 other radiologists with different years of experience (readers 1 and 2). The INTACT system consists of a sequential pipeline in which first the anatomical structures of the lung are segmented, then the various types of pathological lung tissue are identified and characterized, and this information is then fed to a random forest classifier able to recommend a radiological diagnosis.
resultsReader 1, reader 2, and INTACT achieved similar accuracy for classifying pulmonary fibrosis into the original 4 categories: 0.6, 0.54, and 0.56, respectively, with P > 0.45. The INTACT system achieved an F-score (harmonic mean for precision and recall) of 0.56, whereas the 2 readers, on average, achieved 0.57 (P = 0.991). For the pooled classification (2 groups, with and without the need for biopsy), reader 1, reader 2, and CAD had similar accuracies of 0.81, 0.70, and 0.81, respectively. The F-score was again similar for the CAD system and the radiologists. The CAD system and the average reader reached F-scores of 0.80 and 0.79 (P = 0.898).
conclusionsWe found that a computer-aided detection algorithm based on machine learning was able to classify idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis with similar accuracy to a human reader.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.