ArticleMagnetic resonance in medicine2020
Reducing temperature errors in transcranial MR-guided focused ultrasound using a reduced-field-of-view sequence.
Article in Magnetic resonance in medicine, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.
- A retraced spiral strategy with semi-automatic deblurring for volumetric thermometry.Magnetic resonance in medicine · 2025Article
- Design and Validation of a Patient-Specific Stereotactic Frame for Transcranial Ultrasound Therapy.IEEE transactions on ultrasonics, ferroelectrics, and frequency control · 2024Article
- Iron-based coupling media for MRI-guided ultrasound surgery.Medical physics · 2022Article
- A preclinical study of diffusion-weighted MRI contrast as an early indicator of thermal ablation.Magnetic resonance in medicine · 2021Article
- The Potential of Adjusting Water Bolus Liquid Properties for Economic and Precise MR Thermometry Guided Radiofrequency Hyperthermia.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
purposeTo reduce temperature errors due to water motion in transcranial MR-guided focused ultrasound (tcMRgFUS) ablation. THEORY AND
methodsIn tcMRgFUS, water is circulated in the transducer bowl around the patient's head for acoustic coupling and heat removal. The water moves during sonications that are monitored by MR thermometry, which causes it to alias into the brain and create temperature errors. To reduce these errors, a two-dimensional excitation pulse was implemented in a gradient-recalled echo thermometry sequence. The pulse suppresses water signal by selectively exciting the brain only, which reduces the imaging FOV. Improvements in temperature precision compared to the conventional full-FOV scan were evaluated in healthy subject scans outside the tcMRgFUS system, gel phantom scans in the system with heating, and in 2×-accelerated head phantom scans in the system without heating.
resultsIn vivo temperature precision (standard deviation of temperature errors) outside the tcMRgFUS system was improved 43% on average, due to the longer TR and TE of the reduced-FOV sequence. In the phantom heating experiments, the hot spot was less distorted in the reduced-FOV scans, and background temperature precision was improved 59% on average. In the accelerated head phantom temperature reconstructions, temperature precision was improved 89% using the reduced-FOV sequence.
conclusionsReduced-FOV temperature imaging alleviates temperature errors due to water bath motion in tcMRgFUS, and enables accelerated temperature mapping with greater precision.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.