Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31483451›Full record

Trial reportJAMA psychiatry2019

Effects of Individual Placement and Support Supplemented With Cognitive Remediation and Work-Focused Social Skills Training for People With Severe Mental Illness: A Randomized Clinical Trial.

Thomas Nordahl Christensen, Iben Gammelgård Wallstrøm, Elsebeth Stenager, Anders Bo Bojesen, Christian Gluud, Merete Nordentoft, Lene Falgaard Eplov

Erratum issued Registry-linked trialAbstract readMulticenter StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in JAMA psychiatry, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. It is linked to trial NCT01722344 (Individual Placement and Support), which is not on this map. Cited by 32 papers, 6 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
32citing papers in PubMed, 6 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT01722344 nacompletednot on this map

Individual Placement and Support (IPS) Enhanced With Cognitive Remediation and Social Skills Training in Denmark: a Randomized Controlled Trial

TypeinterventionalSponsorMental Health Centre Copenhagen, Bispebjerg and Frederiksberg HospitalRan2012 to 2019Enrolled717ConditionsSchizophrenia, Schizotypal and Delusional Disorders, Bipolar Affective Disorder, Recurrent Depressive DisorderArmsIndividual Placement and support (IPS), IPS plus
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

32 citing papers in PubMed, 6 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Trial
  8. Trial
  9. Trial
  10. Trial
  11. Trial
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Services to improve outcomes in severe mental disorders.Neuropsychiatrie : Klinik, Diagnostik, Therapie und Rehabilitation : Organ der Gesellschaft Osterreichischer Nervenarzte und Psychiater · 2026
    Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Individual placement and support: History, current status, and future directions.PCN reports : psychiatry and clinical neurosciences · 2023
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Thomas Nordahl ChristensenMental Health Centre Copenhagen, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Iben Gammelgård WallstrømResearch Unit of Psychiatry, Department of Clinical Research, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark.
Elsebeth StenagerResearch Unit Psychiatry, Department of Regional Health Services, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark.
Anders Bo BojesenResearch Unit, Mental Health Centre Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Christian GluudCopenhagen Trial Unit, Centre for Clinical Intervention Research, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen University Hospital, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Merete NordentoftMental Health Centre Copenhagen, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Lene Falgaard EplovResearch Unit, Mental Health Centre Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Importance: Individual placement and support (IPS) seems to be an effective vocational intervention for people with severe mental illness, but its effects have not yet been shown in the Danish welfare model. Also, effects may be enhanced by adding cognitive remediation and work-focused social skills training (IPS with enhancements [IPSE]). Objectives: To investigate the effects of IPS vs IPSE vs service as usual (SAU) on a population of individuals with severe mental illness in Denmark. Design, Setting, and Participants: This was an investigator-initiated, 3-group, parallel, assessor-blinded randomized clinical trial that used early-intervention teams or community mental health services in 3 Danish cities to recruit participants with severe mental illness. Participants were randomly assigned to receive IPS, IPSE, or SAU from November 2012 to February 2016, and follow-up continued until August 2017. Interventions: Participants allocated to the IPS intervention received vocational support per the principles of the IPS model. Participants in the IPSE arm received cognitive remediation and social skills training in addition to IPS. The group receiving SAU received vocational rehabilitation at the Danish job centers. Main Outcomes and Measures: The primary outcome was the number of hours in competitive employment or education during the 18-month follow-up. Secondary outcomes included intergroup differences in employment or education at any point during follow-up; time to employment or education; and cognitive and social functioning, self-esteem, and self-efficacy. Results: Of the 720 included participants (mean [SD] age, 32.8 [9.9] years; 276 [38.3%] women), 243 received IPS, 238 received IPSE, and 239 received SAU. Most participants (551 [76.5%]) were diagnosed with a schizophrenia spectrum disorder. During the 18-month follow-up, the IPSE group worked or studied a mean (SD) of 488.1 (735.6) hours, compared with 340.8 (573.8) hours in the group receiving SAU (success-rate difference [SRD], 0.151 [95% CI, 0.01-0.295]; P = .016). The mean (SD) in the IPS group was 411 (656.9) (SRD, 0.127 [95% CI, -0.017 to 0.276]; P = .004). There was no difference between IPS and IPSE in any vocational outcomes, and the 3 groups showed no differences in any nonvocational outcomes, except that the IPS and IPSE groups were more satisfied with the services received than the group receiving SAU (IPS vs SAU: SRD, 0.310 [95% CI, 0.167-0.445]); IPSE vs SAU: SRD, 0.341 [95% CI, 0.187-0.478]). Conclusions and Relevance: Compared with SAU, IPS and IPSE seem to be viable routes to increase employment and education rates in people with severe mental illness in Denmark, but no additional effects were observed by enhancing IPS. Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT01722344.

Indexed as

EducationEmploymentOutcome Assessment, Health CareSocial SkillsAdultBipolar DisorderCognitive RemediationCommunity Mental Health ServicesDenmarkDepressive DisorderFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHumansMaleMiddle AgedRehabilitation, Vocational

Identifiers

PMID31483451
PMCPMC6727676

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.