ArticleCroatian medical journal2019
The efficacy and adverse effects of budesonide in remission induction treatment of autoimmune hepatitis: a retrospective study.
Article in Croatian medical journal, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 13 citations in OpenAlex.
- British Society of Gastroenterology guidelines for diagnosis and management of autoimmune hepatitis.Gut · 2025Guideline
- What is the optimal first-line treatment of autoimmune hepatitis? A systematic review with meta-analysis of randomised trials and comparative cohort studies.BMJ open gastroenterology · 2025Pooled it
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
aimTo compare the early biochemical response and rate of adverse effects in patients who received prednisolone (PRED)/azathioprine (AZA) and those who received budesonide (BUD)/AZA as the first-line treatment for autoimmune hepatitis.
methodsThe study involved 25 patients receiving PRED 30 mg/day + AZA 50 mg/day and 25 patients receiving BUD 9 mg/day + AZA 50 mg/day from February 2015 to February 2018. Biochemical and hemogram data at baseline and after 6 months of treatment, and adverse effects observed in the follow-up, were compared.
resultsThere was no difference between the groups in biochemical response (17 patients receiving PRED/AZA and 18 receiving BUD/AZA) and the rate of adverse effects (9 patients receiving PRED/AZA and 5 receiving BUD/AZA). The total number of adverse effects in the BUD/AZA group was lower (15 vs 7) and the treatment was discontinued in 2 (8%) patients in PRED/AZA group, while no treatment discontinuation was observed in BUD/AZA group.
conclusionsThis study showed no differences in biochemical response between the groups. Lower, although not significantly, rate of adverse effects and lower total number of adverse effects indicate that BUD/AZA may potentially be used as the first-line treatment of choice, especially in patients with obesity, diabetes, resistant hypertension, glaucoma, or osteoporosis.
Indexed as
Identifiers
31483120PMC6734566W2974430294What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.