Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31483010›Full record

ArticleSao Paulo medical journal = Revista paulista de medicina2019

Secondary prevention of coronary heart disease: a cross-sectional analysis on the Brazilian Longitudinal Study of Adult Health (ELSA-Brasil).

Marina Gabriela Birck, Alessandra Carvalho Goulart, Paulo Andrade Lotufo, Isabela Martins Benseñor

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Sao Paulo medical journal = Revista paulista de medicina, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Cardiovascular Statistics - Brazil 2023.Arquivos brasileiros de cardiologia · 2024
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Cardiovascular Statistics - Brazil 2021.Arquivos brasileiros de cardiologia · 2022
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Subclinical thyroid diseases as a non-classical risk factor for cardiovascular diseases.Sao Paulo medical journal = Revista paulista de medicina · 2020
    Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Marina Gabriela BirckBSc, MSc. Postgraduate Student, Faculdade de Medicina da Universidade de São Paulo (FMUSP), São Paulo (SP), Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3003-1839
Alessandra Carvalho GoulartMD, PhD. Clinical Epidemiologist and Researcher, Center for Clinical and Epidemiological Research, Hospital Universitário da Universidade de São Paulo (HU-USP), São Paulo (SP), Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1076-5210
Paulo Andrade LotufoMD, DrPH. Full Professor, Department of Internal Medicine, Faculdade de Medicina da Universidade de São Paulo (FMUSP), São Paulo (SP), Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4856-8450
Isabela Martins BenseñorMD, PhD. Professor, Department of Internal Medicine, and Director of Center for Clinical and Epidemiological Research, Hospital Universitário da Universidade de São Paulo (HU-USP), São Paulo (SP), Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6723-5678

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundCoronary heart disease (CHD) remains a major cause of mortality worldwide and in Brazil. Use of standard medications after CHD has been proven to avoid new events and reduce early mortality.

objectivesThis study aimed to analyze secondary prevention of CHD and its association with the baseline characteristics of the Brazilian Longitudinal Study of Adult Health (ELSA-Brasil). DESIGN AND

settingCross-sectional analysis on ELSA-Brasil data.

methodsSecondary prevention of CHD recommended in standard guidelines (antiplatelet plus beta-blocker plus lipid-lowering drug, with or without angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors, ACEI, or angiotensin receptor blockers, ARB) was evaluated in relation to sociodemographic data and the time since the coronary event. The chi-square test, one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) and Mann-Whitney test were performed, as necessary.

resultsAmong 15,094 participants, 2.7% reported a previous diagnosis of CHD. Use of recommended drugs for secondary prevention was reported by almost 35% of the participants. Medication use for secondary prevention was generally more frequent among high-income participants than among low-income participants. Use of ARB and ACEI was different between participants who had private health insurance and those who only used the public healthcare system. Men were more likely to use medication than women. The frequency with which participants used the recommended drugs was similar in all time periods after CHD, but use of only one drug increased progressively across time periods.

conclusionThe use of medication for secondary prevention of CHD was lower than what is recommended in standardized guidelines, especially among women and lower-income participants.

Indexed as

AdultAgedBrazilCoronary DiseaseCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHumansLongitudinal StudiesMaleMiddle AgedSecondary PreventionSocioeconomic Factors

Identifiers

PMID31483010
PMCPMC9744003

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.