Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31482976›Full record

Observational studyBrazilian journal of medical and biological research = Revista brasileira de pesquisas medicas e biologica2019

Validation of the two-minute step test in obese with comorbibities and morbidly obese patients.

P A Ricci, R Cabiddu, S P Jürgensen, L D André, C R Oliveira, L Di Thommazo-Luporini, F P Ortega, A Borghi-Silva

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract readObservational StudyValidation Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in Brazilian journal of medical and biological research = Revista brasileira de pesquisas medicas e biologica, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05064943 (Reliability and Validity of the 2-Minute Step Test in Patients With Knee Arthroplasty), which is not on this map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
2.9field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05064943 completednot on this mapstarted 2021, after this paper: background citation

Reliability and Validity of the 2-Minute Step Test in Patients With Knee Arthroplasty

TypeobservationalSponsorKutahya Health Sciences UniversityRan2021 to 2022Enrolled51ConditionsTotal Knee Replacement, Reliability and ValidityArms2-minute step test
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 21 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Reliability and Construct Validity of the Six-Minute Step Test in Individuals With Non-Specific Chronic Low Back Pain.Physiotherapy research international : the journal for researchers and clinicians in physical therapy · 2026
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Association of Step Count with Cardiorespiratory Fitness: Results from the Virtual 2-Minute Step Test.Archives of rehabilitation research and clinical translation · 2024
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Reference equations of oxygen uptake for the step test in the obese population.Brazilian journal of medical and biological research = Revista brasileira de pesquisas medicas e biologica · 2022
    Article
  11. Observational
  12. Review
  13. Reliability and validity of six-minute step test in patients with heart failure.Brazilian journal of medical and biological research = Revista brasileira de pesquisas medicas e biologica · 2021
    Article
  14. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

P A RicciLaboratório de Fisioterapia Cardiopulmonar, Universidade Federal de São Carlos, São Carlos, SP, Brasil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6629-7933
R CabidduLaboratório de Fisioterapia Cardiopulmonar, Universidade Federal de São Carlos, São Carlos, SP, Brasil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6508-5485
S P JürgensenLaboratório de Fisioterapia Cardiopulmonar, Universidade Federal de São Carlos, São Carlos, SP, Brasil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9526-2315
L D AndréLaboratório de Fisioterapia Cardiopulmonar, Universidade Federal de São Carlos, São Carlos, SP, Brasil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8764-775X
C R OliveiraDepartamento de Medicina, Universidade Federal de São Carlos, São Carlos, SP, Brasil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6154-3488
L Di Thommazo-LuporiniLaboratório de Fisioterapia Cardiopulmonar, Universidade Federal de São Carlos, São Carlos, SP, Brasil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1609-6492
F P OrtegaSanta Casa de Misericórdia de São Carlos, São Carlos, SP, Brasil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6000-9774
A Borghi-SilvaLaboratório de Fisioterapia Cardiopulmonar, Universidade Federal de São Carlos, São Carlos, SP, Brasil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3891-6941
Universidade Federal de São Carlos · BRSanta Casa de Misericórdia de São Carlos · BR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cardiopulmonary fitness assessment is a valuable resource to obtain quantitative indicators of an individual's physical performance. The cardiopulmonary exercise test (CPX), considered the gold standard test for this evaluation, is costly and difficult to be accessed by the general population. In order to make this evaluation more accessible, and to better reflect the performance of daily life activities, alternative tests were proposed. Morbidly obese patients present limitations that impair physical performance assessment and could benefit from a test of shorter duration, provided it is validated. This observational study aimed to validate the two-minute step test (2MST) as a tool to evaluate functional capacity (FC) in obese with comorbidities and morbidly obese patients, compared the 2MST with CPX as a measure of physical performance, and developed a predictive equation to estimate peak oxygen uptake (VO2) in the 2MST. The CPX and the 2MST were performed and metabolic and ventilatory parameters were recorded in 31 obese individuals (BMI>35 kg/m2). Pearson correlation and multiple linear regression analyses were performed to evaluate the peak VO2 best predictors. Bland-Altman analysis was performed to assess the agreement between the two methods. Peak VO2 measured by CPX and 2MST showed a strong correlation (r=0.70, P<0.001) and there was a moderate correlation between peak VO2 of the 2MST and the number of up-and-down step cycles (UDS) (r=0.55; P=0.01). The reference equation obtained was: VO2 (mL·kg-1·min-1) = 13.341 + 0.138 × total UDS - (0.183 × BMI), with an estimated standard error of 1.3 mL·kg-1·min-1. The 2MST is a viable, practical, and easily accessible test for FC. UDS and BMI can predict peak VO2 satisfactorily.

Indexed as

AdolescentAdultCardiorespiratory FitnessComorbidityExercise ToleranceFemaleHeart RateHumansMaleMiddle AgedObesityObesity, MorbidOxygen ConsumptionTime FactorsWalk TestYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID31482976
PMCPMC6720022
OpenAlexW2970690638

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.