Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31482661›Full record

ArticleNeurogastroenterology and motility2019

Gastroesophageal reflux disease and chronic cough: A possible mechanism elucidated by ambulatory pH-impedance-pressure monitoring.

Xiaoqing Li, Sihui Lin, Zhifeng Wang, Hong Zhang, Xiaohong Sun, Ji Li, Dong Wu, Meiyun Ke, Xiucai Fang

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Neurogastroenterology and motility, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
2.0field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 33 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Xiaoqing LiDepartement of Gastroenterology, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China.ORCID 0000-0003-1334-1544
Sihui LinDepartement of Gastroenterology, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China.
Zhifeng WangDepartement of Gastroenterology, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China.
Hong ZhangDepartment of Respiration, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China.
Xiaohong SunDepartement of Gastroenterology, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China.
Ji LiDepartement of Gastroenterology, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China.
Dong WuDepartement of Gastroenterology, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China.
Meiyun KeDepartement of Gastroenterology, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China.
Xiucai FangDepartement of Gastroenterology, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China.ORCID 0000-0002-5600-8779
Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe pathophysiological mechanism(s) of gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD)-related chronic cough (CC) is unclear. We aimed to determine the mechanism of reflux-induced cough by synchronous monitoring of reflux episodes, esophageal motility, and cough.

methodsPatients with GERD were prospectively enrolled and classified into GERD with CC (GERD-CC) and without CC (GERD) groups. Twenty-four-hour ambulatory pH-impedance-pressure monitoring was performed; the reflux patterns, esophageal motility during prolonged exposure to acid and characteristics of reflux episodes that induced coughing paroxysms were analyzed. KEY

resultsThirty-one patients with GERD-CC and 47 with GERD were enrolled; all of whose monitoring results fulfilled the criteria for diagnosis of GERD. Patients with GERD-CC had higher reflux symptom scores, longer exposure to acid, higher DeMeester scores, and more frequent reflux episodes, proximal extent reflux detected by impedance, and higher percentage of strongly acidic reflux than patients in the GERD group (all P < .05). Of 63 reflux-cough episodes identified in the GERD-CC group, 74.6% of distal reflux and 67.0% of proximal reflux episodes were acidic. More patients had low pan-esophageal pressure in primary peristalsis (48.5% vs 11.8%, P = .000) and synchronous contraction in secondary peristalsis during prolonged exposure to acid in the GERD-CC than in the GERD group (63.9% vs 9.1%, P = .000). CONCLUSIONS & INFERENCES: Proximal acidic reflux and distal reflux-reflex are jointly associated with reflux-induced cough in patients with GERD. Low pan-esophageal pressure in primary peristalsis and synchronous contraction in secondary peristalsis may play important roles in GERD-associated chronic cough.

Indexed as

AdolescentAdultAgedChronic DiseaseCoughElectric ImpedanceEsophageal Motility DisordersEsophageal pH MonitoringFemaleGastroesophageal RefluxGastrointestinal ContentsGastroscopyHeartburnHumansLaryngopharyngeal RefluxMaleambulatory pH-impedance-pressure monitoringchronic coughesophageal motilityexposure to acidgastroesophageal reflux disease

Identifiers

PMID31482661
PMCPMC6899806
OpenAlexW2971837313

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.