Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31482613›Full record

Trial reportClinical cardiology2019

Eplerenone in patients with myocardial infarction and "mid-range" ejection fraction: An analysis from the EPHESUS trial.

João Pedro Ferreira, Xavier Rossello, Bertram Pitt, Patrick Rossignol, Faiez Zannad

Open access · goldAbstract readClinical Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Clinical cardiology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
1.6field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 14 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Observational
  5. Article
  6. Observational
  7. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 3 countries.

João Pedro FerreiraUniversité de Lorraine, Centre d'Investigation Clinique- Plurithématique Inserm CIC-P 1433, Nancy, France.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2304-6138
Xavier RosselloCentro Nacional de Investigaciones Cardiovasculares (CNIC), Madrid, Spain.
Bertram PittDepartment of Medicine, University of Michigan School of Medicine, Ann Arbor, Michigan.
Patrick RossignolUniversité de Lorraine, Centre d'Investigation Clinique- Plurithématique Inserm CIC-P 1433, Nancy, France.
Faiez ZannadUniversité de Lorraine, Centre d'Investigation Clinique- Plurithématique Inserm CIC-P 1433, Nancy, France.
Inserm · FRSpanish National Centre for Cardiovascular Research · ESUniversity of Michigan · US

Funding

Contrat de Plan Etat Région Lorraine and FEDER IT2MPFrench National Research Agency Fighting Heart Failure ANR-15-RHU-0004French PIA project "Lorraine Université d'Excellence" GEENAGE ANR-15-IDEX-04-LUESEC-CNIC CARDIOJOVEN
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundTrials using mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists (MRAs) in myocardial infraction (MI) without heart failure (HF) or systolic impairment have been underpowered to assess morbidity-mortality benefit. In EPHESUS 6632 patients were included, of whom 11% had an ejection fraction (EF) of 40% and HF or diabetes. We aim to assess the potential benefit of MRAs in MI with EF of 40%.

methodsCox models with interaction term for EF. The primary outcome was a composite of cardiovascular death or hospitalization for cardiovascular reasons. HYPOTHESIS: Patients with an EF of 40% benefit similarly from MRA therapy to those with an EF <40%.

resultsIn EPHESUS, 753 patients had an EF = 40% and 5864 an EF < 40%. Patients with an EF = 40% were younger (63 vs 64 years), had lower heart rate (73 vs 75 bpm), less atrial fibrillation (10% vs 14%), previous MI (21% vs 28%), HF hospitalization (5% vs 8%), and had more often reperfusion therapy and/or revascularization (55% vs 44%). The mean EF was 40.0 ± 0.3% in those with EF = 40% vs 32.2 ± 5.9% in those with EF < 40%. The primary outcome occurred in 13.3% (10 events per 100 py) of the patients with EF = 40% vs 22.9% (19 events per 100 py) in those with EF < 40%; adjusted HR for EF = 40% vs <40% = 0.65 (0.53-0.81). Eplerenone reduced the event-rate homogenously regardless of EF (interaction

conclusionEplerenone reduces hospitalizations and mortality in patients with MI and EF = 40% similarly to patients with EF < 40%. These findings suggest that MI patients with EF in the "mid-range zone" may also benefit from MRA therapy which might help clinicians in their treatment decisions.

Indexed as

Cause of DeathDose-Response Relationship, DrugEplerenoneFemaleFranceHospitalizationHumansMaleMiddle AgedMineralocorticoid Receptor AntagonistsMorbidityMyocardial InfarctionStroke VolumeSurvival RateTreatment OutcomeVentricular Function, LeftEplerenoneMineralocorticoid Receptor Antagonistsejection fractioneplerenonemineralocorticoid receptor antagonistsmyocardial infarctiontreatment effect

Identifiers

PMID31482613
PMCPMC6837025
OpenAlexW2972176251

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.