Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31482476›Full record

ArticleGastric cancer : official journal of the International Gastric Cancer Association and the Japanese Gastric Cancer Association2020

Identification of the clinically most relevant postoperative complications after gastrectomy: a population-based cohort study.

Emma C Gertsen, Lucas Goense, Hylke J F Brenkman, Richard van Hillegersberg, Jelle P Ruurda, Dutch Upper Gastrointestinal Cancer Audit (DUCA) group

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Gastric cancer : official journal of the International Gastric Cancer Association and the Japanese Gastric Cancer Association, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Outcomes after gastrectomy according to the Gastrectomy Complications Consensus Group (GCCG) in the Dutch Upper GI Cancer Audit (DUCA).Gastric cancer : official journal of the International Gastric Cancer Association and the Japanese Gastric Cancer Association · 2024
    Article
  11. Impact ofAnnals of surgical oncology · 2024
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Emma C GertsenDivision Cancer Center, Department of Surgery, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Heidelberglaan 100, 3508 GA, Utrecht, The Netherlands.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9230-1158
Lucas GoenseDivision Cancer Center, Department of Surgery, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Heidelberglaan 100, 3508 GA, Utrecht, The Netherlands.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5824-8736
Hylke J F BrenkmanDivision Cancer Center, Department of Surgery, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Heidelberglaan 100, 3508 GA, Utrecht, The Netherlands.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4573-9143
Richard van HillegersbergDivision Cancer Center, Department of Surgery, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Heidelberglaan 100, 3508 GA, Utrecht, The Netherlands.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7134-261X
Jelle P RuurdaDivision Cancer Center, Department of Surgery, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Heidelberglaan 100, 3508 GA, Utrecht, The Netherlands. J.P.Ruurda@umcutrecht.nl.
Dutch Upper Gastrointestinal Cancer Audit (DUCA) group

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPostoperative complications frequently occur after gastrectomy for gastric cancer and are associated with poor clinical outcomes, such as mortality and reoperations. The aim of study was to identify the clinically most relevant complications after gastrectomy, using the population-attributable fraction (PAF).

methodsBetween 2011 and 2017, all patients who underwent potentially curative gastrectomy for gastric adenocarcinoma were included from the Dutch Upper GI Cancer Audit. Postoperative outcomes (morbidity, mortality, recovery and hospitalization) were evaluated. The prevalence of postoperative complications (e.g., anastomotic leakage and pneumonia) and of the study outcomes were calculated. The adjusted relative risk and Confidence Interval (CI) for each complication-outcome pair were calculated. Subsequently, the PAF was calculated, which represents the percentage of a given outcome occurring in the population, caused by individual complications, taking both the relative risk and the frequency in which a complication occurs into account.

resultsIn total, 2176 patients were analyzed. Anastomotic leakage and pulmonary complications had the greatest overall impact on postoperative mortality (PAF 29.2% [95% CI 19.3-39.1] and 21.6% [95% CI 10.5-32.7], respectively) and prolonged hospitalization (PAF 12.9% [95% CI 9.7-16.0] and 14.7% [95% CI 11.0-18.8], respectively). Anastomotic leakage had the greatest overall impact on re-interventions (PAF 25.1% [95% CI 20.5-29.7]) and reoperations (PAF 30.3% [95% CI 24.3-36.3]). Intra-abdominal abscesses had the largest impact on readmissions (PAF 7.0% [95% CI 3.2-10.9]). Other complications only had a small effect on these outcomes.

conclusionSurgical improvement programs should focus on preventing or managing anastomotic leakage and pulmonary complications, since these complications have the greatest overall impact on clinical outcomes after gastrectomy.

Indexed as

AdenocarcinomaAgedAnastomotic LeakCohort StudiesFemaleFollow-Up StudiesGastrectomyHumansMalePostoperative ComplicationsPrognosisRisk FactorsStomach NeoplasmsSurvival RateGastrectomyGastric cancerMorbidityPopulation-based

Identifiers

PMID31482476
PMCPMC7031165

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.