Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31482436›Full record

ReviewCurrent cardiology reports2019

Role of Invasive and Non-invasive Imaging Tools in the Diagnosis and Optimal Treatment of Patients with Spontaneous Coronary Artery Dissection.

Enrico Cerrato, Federico Giacobbe, Cristina Rolfo, Giorgio Quadri, Francesco Tomassini, Fabio Ferrari, Fabio Mariani, Matteo Anselmino, Matteo Bianco, Davide Belliggiano and 11 more

Open access · greenAbstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Current cardiology reports, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
0.3field-weighted citation impact, top 36% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

21 authors at 7 institutions in 2 countries.

Enrico CerratoInterventional Cardiology Unit, Orbassano, and Infermi Hospital, San Luigi Gonzaga University Hospital, Rivoli, Turin, Italy. enrico.cerrato@gmail.com.
Federico GiacobbeDivision of Cardiology, "Città della Salute e della Scienza di Torino" Hospital, Department of Medical Sciences, University of Turin, Turin, Italy.
Cristina RolfoInterventional Cardiology Unit, Orbassano, and Infermi Hospital, San Luigi Gonzaga University Hospital, Rivoli, Turin, Italy.
Giorgio QuadriInterventional Cardiology Unit, Orbassano, and Infermi Hospital, San Luigi Gonzaga University Hospital, Rivoli, Turin, Italy.
Francesco TomassiniInterventional Cardiology Unit, Orbassano, and Infermi Hospital, San Luigi Gonzaga University Hospital, Rivoli, Turin, Italy.
Fabio FerrariInterventional Cardiology Unit, Orbassano, and Infermi Hospital, San Luigi Gonzaga University Hospital, Rivoli, Turin, Italy.
Fabio MarianiInterventional Cardiology Unit, Orbassano, and Infermi Hospital, San Luigi Gonzaga University Hospital, Rivoli, Turin, Italy.
Matteo AnselminoDivision of Cardiology, "Città della Salute e della Scienza di Torino" Hospital, Department of Medical Sciences, University of Turin, Turin, Italy.
Matteo BiancoDepartment of Cardiology, San Luigi Gonzaga University Hospital, Orbassano, Turin, Italy.
Davide BelliggianoDivision of Cardiology, "Città della Salute e della Scienza di Torino" Hospital, Department of Medical Sciences, University of Turin, Turin, Italy.
Luca Lo SavioCardiology Division, Infermi Hospital, Rivoli, Turin, Italy.
Alfonso FranzéCardiology Division, Infermi Hospital, Rivoli, Turin, Italy.
Umberto BarberoCardiology Division, Santissima Annunziata Hospital, Savigliano, Italy.
Italo PortoInterventional Cardiology Unit, San Martino Hospital, University of Genoa, Genoa, Italy.
Hernán Mejía-RenteríaHospital Clinico San Carlos IDISCC, Complutense University of Madrid, Madrid, Spain.
Fernando MacayaHospital Clinico San Carlos IDISCC, Complutense University of Madrid, Madrid, Spain.
Pablo SalinasServicio de Cardiologia, Hospital Clinico San Carlos, Instituto de Investigacion Sanitaria del Hospital Clinico San Carlos (IdISSC), Madrid, Spain.
Nieves GonzaloHospital Clinico San Carlos IDISCC, Complutense University of Madrid, Madrid, Spain.
Javier EscanedHospital Clinico San Carlos IDISCC, Complutense University of Madrid, Madrid, Spain.
Laura MontagnaDepartment of Cardiology, San Luigi Gonzaga University Hospital, Orbassano, Turin, Italy.
Ferdinando VarbellaInterventional Cardiology Unit, Orbassano, and Infermi Hospital, San Luigi Gonzaga University Hospital, Rivoli, Turin, Italy.
Ospedale San Luigi Gonzaga · ITHospital Clínico San Carlos · ESUniversity of Turin · ITOspedale di Rivoli · ITUniversidad Complutense de Madrid · ESOspedale SS. Annunziata · ITUniversity of Genoa · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purpose of reviewSpontaneous coronary artery dissection (SCAD) is a serious non-atherosclerotic disease, most frequently presenting as an acute coronary syndrome and affecting female patients. Considering that diagnosis of SCAD is often elusive, and its interventional treatment is associated to a higher rate of complications than obstructive atherosclerotic disease, we aim to review all the imaging tools currently available for the optimal diagnosis and treatment of this condition. RECENT

findingsThe developments in both invasive and non-invasive imaging alternatives to coronary angiography, such as intravascular ultrasound, optical coherence tomography, and computed coronary angiography, have largely contributed to appraise the epidemiology of SCAD, understand its causative pathophysiological mechanisms, and improve our ability to confirm doubtful cases of SCAD. Intracoronary imaging is also a valuable in deciding the best therapeutic approach and in guiding interventions in those patients requiring percutaneous treatment. Furthermore, non-invasive imaging is a key tool in ruling out significant extracoronary vascular abnormalities which frequently occur in patients with underlying conditions like fibromuscular dysplasia who develop SCAD. Main imaging tools employed in SCAD cases could have advantages and drawbacks. Focusing on different types of SCAD, operators should be able to choose the best imaging technique for diagnosis, management, and follow-up.

Indexed as

Tomography, Optical CoherenceCoronary AngiographyCoronary Vessel AnomaliesFemaleHumansVascular DiseasesAcute coronary syndromeCoronary angiographyIntravascular ultrasoundInvasive imaging toolsOptical coherence tomographySpontaneous coronary artery dissection

Identifiers

PMID31482436
OpenAlexW2972262380

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.