Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31482348›Full record

ArticleSurgical endoscopy2020

Outcomes following early versus delayed cholecystectomy performed for acute cholangitis.

Andrew Discolo, Shelby Reiter, Bryce French, Danielle Hayes, Gary Lucas, Lancy Tan, James Scanlan, Ryan Martinez

Abstract readComparative Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Surgical endoscopy, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
1.4field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 20 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Evaluation of Risk Factors for Postoperative Infection in 176 Patients Undergoing Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy at a Single Center.Medical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research · 2026
    Article
  3. Reassessing cholecystectomy timing in gallstone-related acute cholangitis.World journal of gastrointestinal endoscopy · 2025
    Article
  4. Impact of index admission cholecystectomyWorld journal of gastrointestinal endoscopy · 2024
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Observational
  8. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Andrew DiscoloDepartment of General Surgery, Swedish Medical Center First Hill, 747 Broadway, Heath Tenth Floor, Seattle, WA, 98122-4307, USA.
Shelby ReiterDepartment of General Surgery, Swedish Medical Center First Hill, 747 Broadway, Heath Tenth Floor, Seattle, WA, 98122-4307, USA. shelby.reiter@swedish.org.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7548-3786
Bryce FrenchDepartment of General Surgery, Swedish Medical Center First Hill, 747 Broadway, Heath Tenth Floor, Seattle, WA, 98122-4307, USA.
Danielle HayesDepartment of General Surgery, Swedish Medical Center First Hill, 747 Broadway, Heath Tenth Floor, Seattle, WA, 98122-4307, USA.
Gary LucasDepartment of General Surgery, Swedish Medical Center First Hill, 747 Broadway, Heath Tenth Floor, Seattle, WA, 98122-4307, USA.
Lancy TanDepartment of General Surgery, Swedish Medical Center First Hill, 747 Broadway, Heath Tenth Floor, Seattle, WA, 98122-4307, USA.
James ScanlanDepartment of General Surgery, Swedish Medical Center First Hill, 747 Broadway, Heath Tenth Floor, Seattle, WA, 98122-4307, USA.
Ryan MartinezDepartment of General Surgery, Swedish Medical Center First Hill, 747 Broadway, Heath Tenth Floor, Seattle, WA, 98122-4307, USA.
Swedish Medical Center · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundEarly cholecystectomy following an episode of gallstone pancreatitis is data supported, however, there is minimal literature regarding the optimal timing for cholecystectomy following an episode of acute cholangitis. Our study aims to determine the ideal timing for laparoscopic cholecystectomy following an episode of acute cholangitis.

methodsA retrospective chart review was done on cholecystectomies performed for cholangitis at our institution from 2008 to 2015. Patients were compared based on timing of cholecystectomy (i.e., index admission versus delayed) and Tokyo severity grade (I-III).

resultsWe identified 151 patients who underwent cholecystectomy for cholangitis at our institution from 2008 to 2015. Cholecystectomy was performed during the index admission for 61.6% of patients and Tokyo grade (TG) did not affect the rate of cholecystectomy during index admission (TG1 65.2%, TG2 64.1%, TG3 52.8%; p = 0.46). There was no difference in average operative time (89.0 min vs. 96.6 min; p = 0.36) or conversion to open cholecystectomy (5.4% vs. 10.3%; p = 0.34) between early and late cholecystectomy groups. There was also no statistically significant difference in intra-operative complications (9.7% vs. 15.5%; p = 0.28) or overall complication rates (16.1% vs. 29.3%; p = 0.05) based on timing of cholecystectomy; however, post-operative complications were significantly higher for the delayed cholecystectomy group (20.7% vs. 6.5%; p = 0.01).

conclusionsEarly cholecystectomy after cholangitis is safe to perform and is not associated with higher operative times or rate of conversion to open, regardless of Tokyo grade. Due to the risk of developing recurrent cholangitis and a higher rate of post-operative complications seen with delayed cholecystectomy, our recommendation is to perform cholecystectomy during the index admission.

Indexed as

Acute DiseaseAdultAgedCholangitisCholecystectomy, LaparoscopicFemaleHospitalizationHumansIntraoperative ComplicationsMaleMiddle AgedOperative TimePostoperative ComplicationsRetrospective StudiesTime FactorsTime-to-TreatmentAcute cholangitisConversion to open cholecystectomyGallstonesTiming of cholecystectomyTokyo grade

Identifiers

PMID31482348
OpenAlexW2972034246

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.