Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31482197›Full record

Trial reportExperimental brain research2019

Efficacy of tRNS and 140 Hz tACS on motor cortex excitability seemingly dependent on sensitivity to sham stimulation.

Viktoria Kortuem, Navah Ester Kadish, Michael Siniatchkin, Vera Moliadze

Abstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Trial report in Experimental brain research, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
1.0field-weighted citation impact, top 23% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 16 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Neuromodulatory effects of transcranial electrical stimulation on emotion regulation in internalizing psychopathologies.Clinical neurophysiology : official journal of the International Federation of Clinical Neurophysiology · 2023
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Viktoria KortuemInstitute of Medical Psychology and Medical Sociology, University Medical Center Schleswig Holstein, Kiel University, Preußerstraße 1-9, 24105, Kiel, Germany.
Navah Ester KadishInstitute of Medical Psychology and Medical Sociology, University Medical Center Schleswig Holstein, Kiel University, Preußerstraße 1-9, 24105, Kiel, Germany.
Michael SiniatchkinInstitute of Medical Psychology and Medical Sociology, University Medical Center Schleswig Holstein, Kiel University, Preußerstraße 1-9, 24105, Kiel, Germany.
Vera MoliadzeInstitute of Medical Psychology and Medical Sociology, University Medical Center Schleswig Holstein, Kiel University, Preußerstraße 1-9, 24105, Kiel, Germany. moliadze@med-psych.uni-kiel.de.
Kiel University · DEEvangelisches Krankenhaus Bielefeld · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This study investigates the effect of corticospinal excitability during sham stimulation on the individual response to transcranial non-invasive brain stimulation (tNIBS). Thirty healthy young adults aged 24.2 ± 2.8 S.D. participated in the study. Sham, as well as 1 mA of tRNS and 140 Hz tACS stimulation were applied for 10 min each at different sessions. The effect of each stimulation type was quantified by recording TMS-induced, motor evoked potentials (MEPs) before (baseline) and at fixed time points after stimulation (T0, T30, T60 min.). According to the individual response to sham stimulation at T0 in comparison to baseline MEPs, subjects were regarded as responder or non-responder to sham. Following, MEPs at T0, T30 and T60 after verum or sham stimulation were assessed with a repeated measures ANOVA with the within-subject factor stimulation (sham, tRNS, 140 Hz tACS) and the between-subjects factor group (responder vs non-responder). We found that individuals who did not show immediately changes in excitability in sham stimulation sessions were the ones who responded to active stimulation conditions. On the other hand, individuals who responded to sham condition, by either increases or decreases in MEPS, did not respond to active verum stimulation. This result suggests that the presence or lack of responses to sham stimulation can provide a marker for how individuals will respond to tRNS/tACS and thus provide an explanation for the variability in interindividual response. The results of this study draw attention to the general reactivity of the brain, which can be taken into account when planning future studies using tNIBS.

Indexed as

Transcranial Direct Current StimulationAdolescentAdultDouble-Blind MethodEvoked Potentials, MotorFemaleHumansMaleMotor CortexPlacebosTranscranial Magnetic StimulationYoung AdultPlacebos140 tACSMEPPlasticitySham stimulationtRNS

Identifiers

PMID31482197
OpenAlexW2972119582

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.