ArticleNeuroradiology2020
A rupture risk analysis of cerebral cavernous malformation associated with developmental venous anomaly using susceptibility-weighted imaging.
Article in Neuroradiology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Fostering evidence building for brainstem cavernous malformations: a critical appraisal of available evidence's quality through a systematic review and BSCM Reporting Guideline proposal.Neurosurgical review · 2025Pooled it
- Developmental venous anomalies on fetal magnetic resonance imaging: prevalence and reproducible radiological phenotypes.Pediatric radiology · 2026Article
- Clinical characteristics and management of cerebral developmental venous anomalies accompanied with cavernous malformation.Neurosurgical review · 2025Observational
- Stereotactic radiosurgery for haemorrhagic cerebral cavernous malformation: a multi-institutional, retrospective study.Stroke and vascular neurology · 2024Article
- Are there differences in clinical presentation, radiologic findings, and outcomes in female patients with cavernous malformation?Acta neurochirurgica · 2023Article
- Neonatal Developmental Venous Anomalies: Clinicoradiologic Characterization and Follow-Up.AJNR. American journal of neuroradiology · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
purposeTo search for the risk factors closely related to cerebral cavernous malformation associated with developmental venous anomaly (CCM-DVA) lesions rupture, laying foundations for the development of reasonable individual treatment plans for patients.
methodsIn this retrospective study, we collected CCM-DVA patients who met the inclusion criteria in our outpatient department from 2014 to 2017, MRI scans were performed including susceptibility-weighted imaging (SWI) and contrast-enhanced imaging, characteristics and basic clinical information were collected then statistically analyzed, CCM-DVA lesions were divided into 3 types according to the location and quantitative relationship between CCM and DVA.
resultsA total number of 319 adult patients were identified with 41.2±11.9 years on average, though univariate and multivariate regression analysis, ruptured presentations were more common in patients with prior hemorrhage (p=0.003), type III CCM-DVA lesions (p=0.001), lesions volume>1 cm
conclusionThe classification based on the relationship between CCM and DVA may be meaningful to predict the risk of lesion rupture and CCM lesions next to DVA distal branches showed a higher risk of rupture.
Indexed as
Identifiers
31482190What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.