ArticleCentral European journal of urology2019
Outcomes of retrograde intrarenal surgery compared with ultra-mini percutaneous nephrolithotomy in the management of renal calculi.
Article in Central European journal of urology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.
- Article
- Evaluation of mini-PCNL and RIRS for renal stones 1-2 cm in an economically challenged setting: A prospective cohort study.Annals of medicine and surgery (2012) · 2022Article
- Comparison of Ultra-Mini Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy and Retrograde Intrarenal Surgery for Renal Stones: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis from the KSER Update Series.Journal of clinical medicine · 2022Review
- Can mini PCNL achieve the same results as RIRS? The initial single center experience.Annals of medicine and surgery (2012) · 2021Article
- Comparative analysis of retrograde intrarenal surgery and modified ultra-mini percutaneous nephrolithotomy in management of lower pole renal stones (1.5-3.5 cm).BMC urology · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionTo evaluate the outcomes of retrograde intrarenal surgery (RIRS) and ultra-mini percutaneous nephrolithotomy (umPCNL) in the management of renal calculi. MATERIAL AND
methodsBetween March 2015 and January 2018, a total of 44 patients were treated with umPCNL. The outcomes of these patients were compared with 75 patients who underwent RIRS for renal calculi during the same time period.
resultsMedian stone size was 9 mm in the umPCNL group and 7 mm in the RIRS group. Stone-free rates after a single procedure were achieved in 85% of patients for the RIRS group and 98% for the umPCNL group. 16% of RIRS patients were left with a ureteric stent, whilst 7% of patients (n = 5) needed a second RIRS. One patient in the umPCNL group was left with a percutaneous nephrostomy; all other patients were left totally tubeless. The mean operative time was 66 minutes in the RIRS group and 55 minutes in the umPCNL group (p = 0.04). The minor complication rates for the RIRS and umPCNL groups were 17% and 15%, respectively. One patient in the RIRS group required postoperative nephrostomy insertion; there were no major complications in the umPCNL group. The median length of stay was 0 days in the RIRS group and 1 day in the umPCNL group.
conclusionsThe overall study showed that umPCNL has low complication rates and good stone-free rates, with a lower requirement for ancilliary procedures. UmPCNL is an acceptable alternative in selected patients with small- to moderate-sized renal calculi.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.