ArticleFrontiers in microbiology2019
Comparative Analysis of Intestine Microbiota of Four Wild Waterbird Species.
Article in Frontiers in microbiology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 33 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
33 citing papers in PubMed, 56 citations in OpenAlex.
- Viral genetic diversity and functional potential in polar and subarctic sea ice.FEMS microbiology ecology · 2026Article
- Hi-C Metagenome Deconvolution of Double-Crested Cormorant (Microorganisms · 2026Article
- Article
- Microbiome eco-evolution of cultivated and wild rice species across the genus Oryza and its importance in supporting rice growth.Microbiome · 2026Article
- Ecological Diversity of Migratory Birds and Their Associated Bacterial Species in South Korea: A Preliminary Study Including Antimicrobial Resistance Profiles.Veterinary sciences · 2025Article
- Differences in Intestinal Microbiota Between White and Common Cranes in the Yellow River Delta During Winter.Biology · 2025Article
- Exploring Bird Gut Microbiota Through Opportunistic Fecal Sampling: Ecological and Evolutionary Perspectives.Ecology and evolution · 2025Article
- Metagenomic Insights into Pigeon Gut Microbiota Characteristics and Antibiotic-Resistant Genes.Biology · 2025Article
- Captivity Reduces Diversity and Shifts Composition of the Great Bustard (Ecology and evolution · 2025Article
- The Potential Role of Boron in the Modulation of Gut Microbiota Composition: An In Vivo Pilot Study.Pharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- Comparative analysis of the gut microbiome of ungulate species from Qinghai-Xizang plateau.Ecology and evolution · 2024Article
- Bacterial communities along parrot digestive and respiratory tracts: the effects of sample type, species and time.International microbiology : the official journal of the Spanish Society for Microbiology · 2024Article
- Similarities and differences: species and diet impact gut microbiota of captive pheasants.PeerJ · 2024Article
- Gut microbiome in two high-altitude bird populations showed heterogeneity in sex and life stage.FEMS microbes · 2024Article
- Inter-year consistencies and discrepancies on intestinal microbiota for overwintering relict gulls: correlations with food composition and implications for environmental adaptation.Frontiers in microbiology · 2024Article
- Variation on gut microbiota diversity of endangered red pandas (Frontiers in microbiology · 2024Article
- Phylosymbiosis: The Eco-Evolutionary Pattern of Insect-Symbiont Interactions.International journal of molecular sciences · 2023Review
- Temporal Variations in the Gut Microbiota of the Globally Endangered Sichuan Partridge (Arborophila rufipectus): Implications for Adaptation to Seasonal Dietary Change and Conservation.Applied and environmental microbiology · 2023Article
- Comparative Analyses of the Fecal Microbiome of Five Wild Black-Billed Capercaillie (Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2023Article
- Gut microbiome diversity and composition is associated with exploratory behavior in a wild-caught songbird.Animal microbiome · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Waterbirds are ubiquitous and globally distributed. Yet, studies on wild waterbirds' gut microbiota are still rare. Our aim was to explore and compare the gut microbial community composition of wild waterbird species. Four wild waterbird species that are either wintering or all-year residents in Israel were studied: great cormorants, little egrets, black-crowned night herons and black-headed gulls. For each bird, three intestinal sections were sampled; anterior, middle and posterior. No significant differences were found among the microbiota compositions in the three intestine sections of each individual bird. Each waterbird species had a unique microbial composition. The gut microbiota of the black-headed gulls' fundamentally deviated from that of the other bird species, probably due to a very high abundance (58.8%) of the genus
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.