SynthesisFrontiers in aging neuroscience2019
Deep Learning in Alzheimer's Disease: Diagnostic Classification and Prognostic Prediction Using Neuroimaging Data.
Synthesis in Frontiers in aging neuroscience, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 184 papers, 14 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
184 citing papers in PubMed, 14 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- From Single-Modal to Multi-Modal Artificial Intelligence in Alzheimer's Disease: A Systematic Review of Databases, Modalities, Diagnostic Performance, and Clinical Translation Challenges.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Pooled it
- The adoption of innovative technologies in Physical and Rehabilitation Medicine: state of the art and unmet needs.European journal of physical and rehabilitation medicine · 2026Pooled it
- Revolutionizing early Alzheimer's disease and mild cognitive impairment diagnosis: a deep learning MRI meta-analysis.Arquivos de neuro-psiquiatria · 2024Pooled it
- The application of artificial intelligence in diagnosis of Alzheimer's disease: a bibliometric analysis.Frontiers in neurology · 2024Pooled it
- Decoding the application of deep learning in neuroscience: a bibliometric analysis.Frontiers in computational neuroscience · 2024Pooled it
- Frontiers and hotspots evolution in mild cognitive impairment: a bibliometric analysis of from 2013 to 2023.Frontiers in neuroscience · 2024Pooled it
- Neural Computation-Based Methods for the Early Diagnosis and Prognosis of Alzheimer's Disease Not Using Neuroimaging Biomarkers: A Systematic Review.Journal of Alzheimer's disease : JAD · 2024Pooled it
- Interpretable machine learning for dementia: A systematic review.Alzheimer's & dementia : the journal of the Alzheimer's Association · 2023Pooled it
- Machine learning with neuroimaging data to identify autism spectrum disorder: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Neuroradiology · 2021Pooled it
- Transfer Learning for Alzheimer's Disease through Neuroimaging Biomarkers: A Systematic Review.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021Pooled it
- Machine learning methods for predicting progression from mild cognitive impairment to Alzheimer's disease dementia: a systematic review.Alzheimer's research & therapy · 2021Pooled it
- Machine Learning and Novel Biomarkers for the Diagnosis of Alzheimer's Disease.International journal of molecular sciences · 2021Pooled it
- Deep learning applications for the classification of psychiatric disorders using neuroimaging data: Systematic review and meta-analysis.NeuroImage. Clinical · 2021Pooled it
- Pooled it
- Inclusion of intracranial volume as a covariate feature improves MRI-based Alzheimer's disease classification.Magma (New York, N.Y.) · 2026Article
- Current Applications of Artificial Intelligence in Neuro-Ophthalmic Imaging: A Narrative Approach.Medical sciences (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Artificial Intelligence That Changes Clinical Neurology Practice: Translating Algorithms Into Actionable Care.Journal of clinical neurology (Seoul, Korea) · 2026Review
- GLP-1 agonists in neurodegeneration: a multimodal biomarker-guided approach.Trends in molecular medicine · 2026Review
- FLAME: Federated Learning and Aggregated Multi-Model Ensemble for Multi-Class Alzheimer's Disease Stage Classification from Structured Clinical Data.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- RDoC-informed explainable AI as a paradigm for multilevel Alzheimer's disease diagnosis and progression prediction: a systematic review.Brain informatics · 2026Review
124 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Deep learning, a state-of-the-art machine learning approach, has shown outstanding performance over traditional machine learning in identifying intricate structures in complex high-dimensional data, especially in the domain of computer vision. The application of deep learning to early detection and automated classification of Alzheimer's disease (AD) has recently gained considerable attention, as rapid progress in neuroimaging techniques has generated large-scale multimodal neuroimaging data. A systematic review of publications using deep learning approaches and neuroimaging data for diagnostic classification of AD was performed. A PubMed and Google Scholar search was used to identify deep learning papers on AD published between January 2013 and July 2018. These papers were reviewed, evaluated, and classified by algorithm and neuroimaging type, and the findings were summarized. Of 16 studies meeting full inclusion criteria, 4 used a combination of deep learning and traditional machine learning approaches, and 12 used only deep learning approaches. The combination of traditional machine learning for classification and stacked auto-encoder (SAE) for feature selection produced accuracies of up to 98.8% for AD classification and 83.7% for prediction of conversion from mild cognitive impairment (MCI), a prodromal stage of AD, to AD. Deep learning approaches, such as convolutional neural network (CNN) or recurrent neural network (RNN), that use neuroimaging data without pre-processing for feature selection have yielded accuracies of up to 96.0% for AD classification and 84.2% for MCI conversion prediction. The best classification performance was obtained when multimodal neuroimaging and fluid biomarkers were combined. Deep learning approaches continue to improve in performance and appear to hold promise for diagnostic classification of AD using multimodal neuroimaging data. AD research that uses deep learning is still evolving, improving performance by incorporating additional hybrid data types, such as-omics data, increasing transparency with explainable approaches that add knowledge of specific disease-related features and mechanisms.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.