Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31481871›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in neuroscience2019

Discovering Implied Serial Order Through Model-Free and Model-Based Learning.

Greg Jensen, Herbert S Terrace, Vincent P Ferrera

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in neuroscience, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Monkeys (Macaca mulatta) rank lists using multiple cognitive mechanisms simultaneously.Journal of comparative psychology (Washington, D.C. : 1983) · 2025
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Superstitious learning of abstract order from random reinforcement.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2022
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Transitive inference after minimal training in rhesus macaques (Macaca mulatta).Journal of experimental psychology. Animal learning and cognition · 2021
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Greg JensenDepartment of Psychology, Columbia University, New York, NY, United States.
Herbert S TerraceDepartment of Psychology, Columbia University, New York, NY, United States.
Vincent P FerreraDepartment of Neuroscience, Columbia University, New York, NY, United States.

Funding

Instrumentation, Fabrication, and Design CoreP30EY019007 · NEI · COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY HEALTH SCIENCES · PI Xin Zhang · 2010 to 2026
$12.9M
Implicit serial learning in monkeys and humansR01MH111703 · NIMH · COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY HEALTH SCIENCES · PI VINCENT P FERRERA, HERBERT S. TERRACE · 2018 to 2026
$5.6M
NEI NIH HHS P30 EY019007NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH111703
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Humans and animals can learn to order a list of items without relying on explicit spatial or temporal cues. To do so, they appear to make use of transitivity, a property of all ordered sets. Here, we summarize relevant research on the transitive inference (TI) paradigm and its relationship to learning the underlying order of an arbitrary set of items. We compare six computational models of TI performance, three of which are model-free (

Indexed as

cognitive mapsmodel-based learningmodel-free learningreinforcement learningtransitive inference

Identifiers

PMID31481871
PMCPMC6710392

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.