Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31481684›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2019

Efficient generation of Knock-in/Knock-out marmoset embryo via CRISPR/Cas9 gene editing.

Wakako Kumita, Kenya Sato, Yasuhiro Suzuki, Yoko Kurotaki, Takeshi Harada, Yang Zhou, Noriyuki Kishi, Kengo Sato, Atsu Aiba, Yasubumi Sakakibara and 3 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 38 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
38citing papers in PubMed
3.0field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

38 citing papers in PubMed, 64 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Non-human primate: the new frontier model of female reproductive engineering.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2025
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Marmosets as models of infectious diseases.Frontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2024
    Review
  9. Review
  10. The neurobiology of vocal communication in marmosets.Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences · 2023
    Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 5 institutions in 2 countries.

Wakako KumitaCentral Institute for Experimental Animals, Kawasaki-shi, Kanagawa, 210-0821, Japan.
Kenya SatoCentral Institute for Experimental Animals, Kawasaki-shi, Kanagawa, 210-0821, Japan.
Yasuhiro SuzukiCentral Institute for Experimental Animals, Kawasaki-shi, Kanagawa, 210-0821, Japan.
Yoko KurotakiCentral Institute for Experimental Animals, Kawasaki-shi, Kanagawa, 210-0821, Japan.
Takeshi HaradaDepartment of Molecular Biology and Biochemistry, Graduate School of Medicine, Osaka University, Suita-shi, Osaka, 565-0871, Japan.
Yang ZhouMcGovern Institute for Brain Research, Department of Brain and Cognitive Sciences, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, Massachusetts, 02139, USA.
Noriyuki KishiLaboratory for Marmoset Neural Architecture, RIKEN Center for Brain Science, Wako-shi, Saitama, 351-0198, Japan.
Kengo SatoDepartment of Biosciences and Informatics, Keio University, Yokohama-shi, Kanagawa, 223-8522, Japan.
Atsu AibaLaboratory of Animal Resources, Center for Disease Biology and Integrative Medicine, Graduate School of Medicine, The University of Tokyo, Hongo, Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo, 113-0033, Japan.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8192-0778
Yasubumi SakakibaraDepartment of Biosciences and Informatics, Keio University, Yokohama-shi, Kanagawa, 223-8522, Japan.
Guoping FengMcGovern Institute for Brain Research, Department of Brain and Cognitive Sciences, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, Massachusetts, 02139, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8021-277X
Hideyuki OkanoLaboratory for Marmoset Neural Architecture, RIKEN Center for Brain Science, Wako-shi, Saitama, 351-0198, Japan.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7482-5935
Erika SasakiCentral Institute for Experimental Animals, Kawasaki-shi, Kanagawa, 210-0821, Japan. esasaki@ciea.or.jp.
Keio University · JPCentral Institute for Experimental Animals · JPMcGovern Institute for Brain Research · USThe University of Tokyo · JPRIKEN Center for Brain Science · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Genetically modified nonhuman primates (NHP) are useful models for biomedical research. Gene editing technologies have enabled production of target-gene knock-out (KO) NHP models. Target-gene-KO/knock-in (KI) efficiency of CRISPR/Cas9 has not been extensively investigated in marmosets. In this study, optimum conditions for target gene modification efficacies of CRISPR/mRNA and CRISPR/nuclease in marmoset embryos were examined. CRISPR/nuclease was more effective than CRISPR/mRNA in avoiding mosaic genetic alteration. Furthermore, optimal conditions to generate KI marmoset embryos were investigated using CRISPR/Cas9 and 2 different lengths (36 nt and 100 nt) each of a sense or anti-sense single-strand oligonucleotide (ssODN). KIs were observed when CRISPR/nuclease and 36 nt sense or anti-sense ssODNs were injected into embryos. All embryos exhibited mosaic mutations with KI and KO, or imprecise KI, of c-kit. Although further improvement of KI strategies is required, these results indicated that CRISPR/Cas9 may be utilized to produce KO/KI marmosets via gene editing.

Indexed as

CRISPR-Cas SystemsEmbryo, MammalianGene EditingGene Knock-In TechniquesGene Knockout TechniquesAnimalsAnimals, Genetically ModifiedCallithrix

Identifiers

PMID31481684
PMCPMC6722079
OpenAlexW2972264072

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.