Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31481670›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2019

Few-cycle Regime Atomic Force Microscopy.

Enrique A López-Guerra, Suhas Somnath, Santiago D Solares, Stephen Jesse, Gabriele Ferrini

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Enrique A López-GuerraDepartment of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering, The George Washington University, Washington, DC, 20052, USA.
Suhas SomnathNational Center for Computational Sciences, Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Oak Ridge, Tennessee, 37831, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5398-3050
Santiago D SolaresDepartment of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering, The George Washington University, Washington, DC, 20052, USA.
Stephen JesseCenter for Nanophase Materials Sciences, Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Oak Ridge, Tennessee, 37831, USA.
Gabriele FerriniInterdisciplinary Laboratories for Advanced Materials Physics, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, I-25121, Brescia, Italy. gabriele.ferrini@unicatt.it.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5062-9099

Funding

DOE | LDRD | Oak Ridge National Laboratory (ORNL) CNMS2014-104
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Traditionally, dynamic atomic force microscopy (AFM) techniques are based on the analysis of the quasi-steady state response of the cantilever deflection in terms of Fourier analysis. Here we describe a technique that instead exploits the often disregarded transient response of the cantilever through a relatively modern mathematical tool, which has caused important developments in several scientific fields but that is still quite unknown in the AFM context: the wavelet analysis. This tool allows us to localize the time-varying spectral composition of the initial oscillations of the cantilever deflection when an impulsive excitation is given (as in the band excitation method), a mode that we call the few-cycle regime. We show that this regime encodes very meaningful information about the tip-sample interaction in a unique and extremely sensitive manner. We exploit this high sensitivity to gain detailed insight into multiple physical parameters that perturb the dynamics of the AFM probe, such as the tip radius, Hamaker constant, sample's elastic modulus and height of an adsorbed water layer. We validate these findings with experimental evidence and computational simulations and show a feasible path towards the simultaneous retrieval of multiple physical parameters.

Identifiers

PMID31481670
PMCPMC6722071

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.