Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31481623›Full record

ArticleProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America2019

Weak warning signals can persist in the absence of gene flow.

J P Lawrence, Bibiana Rojas, Antoine Fouquet, Johanna Mappes, Annelise Blanchette, Ralph A Saporito, Renan Janke Bosque, Elodie A Courtois, Brice P Noonan

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed
10.4field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 66 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Defensive coloration is not a reliable indicator of fungal infection in aposematic poison frogs.Behavioral ecology : official journal of the International Society for Behavioral Ecology
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 7 institutions in 4 countries.

J P LawrenceDepartment of Biology, University of Mississippi, University, MS 38677; jplarry@gmail.com bibiana.rojas@jyu.fi.ORCID 0000-0001-8577-4870
Bibiana RojasDepartment of Biological and Environmental Science, University of Jyväskylä, 40014 Jyväskylä, Finland; jplarry@gmail.com bibiana.rojas@jyu.fi.ORCID 0000-0002-6715-7294
Antoine FouquetLaboratoire Evolution et Diversité Biologique, Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique, UMR5174, 31062 Toulouse cedex 9, France.
Johanna MappesDepartment of Biological and Environmental Science, University of Jyväskylä, 40014 Jyväskylä, Finland.
Annelise BlanchetteDepartment of Biology, John Carroll University, University Heights, OH 44118.
Ralph A SaporitoDepartment of Biology, John Carroll University, University Heights, OH 44118.
Renan Janke BosqueDepartment of Biology, University of Mississippi, University, MS 38677.
Elodie A CourtoisLaboratoire Ecologie, Evolution, Interactions des Systèmes Amazoniens, Centre de Recherche de Montabo, Universite de Guyane, BP 70620, 97334 Cayenne cedex, France.
Brice P NoonanDepartment of Biology, University of Mississippi, University, MS 38677.
John Carroll University · USUniversity of Jyväskylä · FICentre National de la Recherche Scientifique · FRÉcologie et Biologie des Interactions · FRPublic Health England · GBUniversity of California, Irvine · USUniversity of Mississippi · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Aposematic organisms couple conspicuous warning signals with a secondary defense to deter predators from attacking. Novel signals of aposematic prey are expected to be selected against due to positive frequency-dependent selection. How, then, can novel phenotypes persist after they arise, and why do so many aposematic species exhibit intrapopulation signal variability? Using a polytypic poison frog (

Indexed as

Animal CommunicationAvoidance LearningBehavior, AnimalGene FlowAnimalsAnimals, PoisonousAnuraBiological EvolutionChickensGenetics, PopulationGenetic VariationModels, BiologicalPhenotypePredatory Behavioraposematismfrequency-dependent selectionpolymorphismsecondary defensesunpalatability

Identifiers

PMID31481623
PMCPMC6754554
OpenAlexW2972025072

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.