ArticleProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America2019
Deliberate enhancement of rainfall using desert plantations.
Article in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Photovoltaic fields largely outperform afforestation efficiency in global climate change mitigation strategies.PNAS nexus · 2023Article
- Hydrological implications of large-scale afforestation in tropical biomes for climate change mitigation.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2022Article
- Contrasting impacts of forests on cloud cover based on satellite observations.Nature communications · 2022Article
- Reply to Wang and D'Odorico: On the sustainability of large-scale desert plantations as a partial solution for climate change.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2019Article
- Water limitations to large-scale desert agroforestry projects for carbon sequestration.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
- Commented on by
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Large-scale afforestation is increasingly being considered as a negative emissions method for sequestering large quantities of atmospheric CO
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.