Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31481560›Full record

ArticleBMJ open2019

The dietary education trial in carbohydrate counting (DIET-CARB Study): study protocol for a randomised, parallel, open-label, intervention study comparing different approaches to dietary self-management in patients with type 1 diabetes.

Bettina Ewers, Tina Vilsbøll, Henrik Ullits Andersen, Jens Meldgaard Bruun

2 registry-linked trialsOpen access · goldAbstract readClinical Trial Protocol
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 2 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
1.0field-weighted citation impact, top 23% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT03623113 nacompletednot on this map

The Dietary Education Trial in Carbohydrate Counting (DIET-CARB Study): A Randomized, Parallel, Open-label, Intervention Study Comparing Different Approaches to Dietary Self-management in Patients With Type 1 Diabetes

TypeinterventionalSponsorSteno Diabetes Center CopenhagenRan2018 to 2022Enrolled63ConditionsType1diabetes, Type1 Diabetes Mellitus, Glucose Metabolism DisordersArmsBCC intervention, ABC-ACC intervention, Standard dietary education
NCT05143411 nacompletednot on this mapstarted 2021, after this paper: background citation

Evaluation of a Mobile Application to Optimize Decision-making in Self-management and Reduction of Complications in Persons With Type 1 Diabetes

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversidad IberoamericanaRan2021 to 2022Enrolled10ConditionsDiabetes Mellitus, Type 1ArmsPRE-test
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 25 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Development of theDigital health
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Bettina EwersSteno Diabetes Center Copenhagen, Gentofte, Denmark bettina.ewers@regionh.dk.
Tina VilsbøllSteno Diabetes Center Copenhagen, Gentofte, Denmark.
Henrik Ullits AndersenSteno Diabetes Center Copenhagen, Gentofte, Denmark.
Jens Meldgaard BruunSteno Diabetes Center Aarhus, Aarhus, Denmark.
Steno Diabetes Center · DKAarhus University · DKUniversity of Copenhagen · DK

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionClinical guidelines recommend that patients with type 1 diabetes (T1D) learn carbohydrate counting or similar methods to improve glycaemic control. Although systematic educating in carbohydrate counting is still not offered as standard-of-care for all patients on multiple daily injections (MDI) insulin therapy in outpatient diabetes clinics in Denmark. This may be due to the lack of evidence as to which educational methods are the most effective for training patients in carbohydrate counting. The objective of this study is to compare the effect of two different educational programmes in carbohydrate counting with the usual dietary care on glycaemic control in patients with T1D. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: The study is designed as a randomised controlled trial with a parallel-group design. The total study duration is 12 months with data collection at baseline, 6 and 12 months. We plan to include 231 Danish adult patients with T1D. Participants will be randomised to one of three dietician-led interventions: (1) a programme in basic carbohydrate counting, (2) a programme in advanced carbohydrate counting including an automated bolus calculator or (3) usual dietary care. The primary outcome is changes in glycated haemoglobin A1c or mean amplitude of glycaemic excursions from baseline to end of the intervention period (week 24) between and within each of the three study groups. Other outcome measures include changes in other parameters of plasma glucose variability (eg, time in range), body weight and composition, lipid profile, blood pressure, mathematical literacy skills, carbohydrate estimation accuracy, dietary intake, diet-related quality of life, perceived competencies in dietary management of diabetes and perceptions of an autonomy supportive dietician-led climate, physical activity and urinary biomarkers. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: The protocol has been approved by the Ethics Committee of the Capital Region, Copenhagen, Denmark. Study findings will be disseminated widely through peer-reviewed publications and conference presentations. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: ClinicalTrials.gov Registry (NCT03623113).

Indexed as

Quality of LifeAdultBiomarkersBlood GlucoseBlood Glucose Self-MonitoringDiabetes Mellitus, Type 1Dietary CarbohydratesDiet, DiabeticExerciseFemaleGlycated HemoglobinHumansMaleMulticenter Studies as TopicPatient Education as TopicRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicBiomarkersBlood GlucoseDietary CarbohydratesGlycated Hemoglobinadvanced carbohydrate countingbasic carbohydrate countingcarbohydrate countingnutritional educationrandomised controlled trialtype 1 diabetes

Identifiers

PMID31481560
PMCPMC6731880
OpenAlexW2971861159

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.