ArticleCancer research2019
Quantification and Localization of Protein-RNA Interactions in Patient-Derived Archival Tumor Tissue.
Article in Cancer research, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.
- A long non-coding RNA Leat1 mediates the hormone responsiveness of EfnB2 during male urogenital development.Communications biology · 2025Article
- A platform for analyzing translational control by RBPs at single-mRNA resolution in cells.Biophysics and physicobiology · 2025Article
- Advances of mRNA vaccine in tumor: a maze of opportunities and challenges.Biomarker research · 2023Review
- Enhancer RNA lnc-CES1-1 inhibits decidual cell migration by interacting with RNA-binding protein FUS and activating PPARγ in URPL.Molecular therapy. Nucleic acids · 2021Article
- Polymerase-tagged respiratory syncytial virus reveals a dynamic rearrangement of the ribonucleocapsid complex during infection.PLoS pathogens · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Abnormal post-transcriptional regulation induced by alterations of mRNA-protein interactions is critical during tumorigenesis and cancer progression and is a hallmark of cancer cells. A more thorough understanding is needed to develop treatments and foresee outcomes. Cellular and mouse tumor models are insufficient for vigorous investigation as they lack consistency and translatability to humans. Moreover, to date, studies in human tumor tissue are predominately limited to expression analysis of proteins and mRNA, which do not necessarily provide information about the frequency of mRNA-protein interactions. Here, we demonstrate novel optimization of a method that is based on FISH and proximity ligation techniques to quantify mRNA interactions with RNA-binding proteins relevant for tumorigenesis and cancer progression in archival patient-derived tumor tissue. This method was validated for multiple mRNA-protein pairs in several cellular models and in multiple types of archival human tumor samples. Furthermore, this approach allowed high-throughput analysis of mRNA-protein interactions across a wide range of tumor types and stages through tumor microarrays. This method is quantitative, specific, and sensitive for detecting interactions and their localization at both the individual cell and whole-tissue scales with single interaction sensitivity. This work presents an important tool in investigating post-transcriptional regulation in cancer on a high-throughput scale, with great potential for translatability into any applications where mRNA-protein interactions are of interest. SIGNIFICANCE: This work presents an approach to sensitively, specifically, and quantitatively detect and localize native mRNA and protein interactions for analysis of abnormal post-transcriptional regulation in patient-derived archival tumor samples.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.