Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31481434›Full record

ArticleThe Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience2019

Differential Tuning to Visual Motion Allows Robust Encoding of Optic Flow in the Dragonfly.

Bernard J E Evans, David C O'Carroll, Joseph M Fabian, Steven D Wiederman

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Paper wasps: A model clade for social cognition.Current opinion in neurobiology · 2024
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Parallel motion vision pathways in the brain of a tropical bee.Journal of comparative physiology. A, Neuroethology, sensory, neural, and behavioral physiology · 2023
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. A Target-Detecting Visual Neuron in the Dragonfly Locks on to Selectively Attended Targets.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2019
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Bernard J E EvansUniversity of Adelaide, Adelaide, 5005 South Australia, Australia, bernard.evans@adelaide.edu.au.ORCID 0000-0002-3517-3775
David C O'CarrollDepartment of Biology, Lund University, Sölvegatan 35, S-22362 Lund, Sweden, and.ORCID 0000-0002-2352-4320
Joseph M FabianUniversity of Adelaide, Adelaide, 5005 South Australia, Australia.ORCID 0000-0001-6739-7581
Steven D WiedermanUniversity of Adelaide, Adelaide, 5005 South Australia, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-0902-803X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Visual cues provide an important means for aerial creatures to ascertain their self-motion through the environment. In many insects, including flies, moths, and bees, wide-field motion-sensitive neurons in the third optic ganglion are thought to underlie such motion encoding; however, these neurons can only respond robustly over limited speed ranges. The task is more complicated for some species of dragonflies that switch between extended periods of hovering flight and fast-moving pursuit of prey and conspecifics, requiring motion detection over a broad range of velocities. Since little is known about motion processing in these insects, we performed intracellular recordings from hawking, emerald dragonflies (

Indexed as

AnimalsCluster AnalysisCuesFemaleFlight, AnimalMaleMotion PerceptionNeuronsOdonataOptic FlowPredatory BehaviorVisual PathwaysVisual Perceptionadaptationdragonflylobula tangential cellmotion visionoptic flow

Identifiers

PMID31481434
PMCPMC6786825

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.