ArticleBMJ open2019
School-based intervention study examining approaches for well-being and mental health literacy of pupils in Year 9 in England: study protocol for a multischool, parallel group cluster randomised controlled trial (AWARE).
Article in BMJ open, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 11 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 32 citations in OpenAlex.
- Why do young men not seek help for affective mental health issues? A systematic review of perceived barriers and facilitators among adolescent boys and young men.European child & adolescent psychiatry · 2025Pooled it
- Universal, school-based, interventions to improve emotional outcomes in children and young people: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Frontiers in child and adolescent psychiatry · 2025Pooled it
- Barriers and Facilitators to Sustaining School-Based Mental Health and Wellbeing Interventions: A Systematic Review.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022Pooled it
- Cost-effectiveness of school-based interventions for well-being and mental health literacy of pupils in year 9 in England: AWARE cluster randomised controlled trial.BJPsych open · 2026Article
- Article
- The impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on adolescent mental health: a natural experiment.Royal Society open science · 2022Article
- 'Shall We Send a Panda?' A Practical Guide to Engaging Schools in Research: Learning from Large-Scale Mental Health Intervention Trials.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022Article
- Educators' perceived mental health literacy and capacity to support students' mental health: associations with school-level characteristics and provision in England.Health promotion international · 2021Article
- Adaptation of a school-based mental health literacy curriculum: from Canadian to English classrooms.Global mental health (Cambridge, England) · 2021Article
- Children and young people's experiences of completing mental health and wellbeing measures for research: learning from two school-based pilot projects.Child and adolescent psychiatry and mental health · 2020Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
11 authors at 8 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionThe prevalence of emotional difficulties in young people is increasing. This upward trend is largely accounted for by escalating symptoms of anxiety and depression. As part of a public health response, there is increasing emphasis on universal prevention programmes delivered in school settings. This protocol describes a three-arm, parallel group cluster randomised controlled trial, investigating the effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of two interventions, alongside a process and implementation evaluation, to improve mental health and well-being of Year 9 pupils in English secondary schools.
methodA three-arm, parallel group cluster randomised controlled trial comparing two different interventions, the Youth Aware of Mental Health (YAM) or the Mental Health and High School Curriculum Guide (The Guide), to Usual Provision. Overall, 144 secondary schools in England will be recruited, involving 8600 Year 9 pupils. The primary outcome for YAM is depressive symptoms, and for The Guide it is intended help-seeking. These will be measured at baseline, 3-6 months and 9-12 months after the intervention commenced. Secondary outcomes measured concurrently include changes to: positive well-being, behavioural difficulties, support from school staff, stigma-related knowledge, attitudes and behaviours, and mental health first aid. An economic evaluation will assess the cost-effectiveness of the interventions, and a process and implementation evaluation (including a qualitative research component) will explore several aspects of implementation (fidelity, quality, dosage, reach, participant responsiveness, adaptations), social validity (acceptability, feasibility, utility), and their moderating effects on the outcomes of interest, and perceived impact. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: This trial has been approved by the University College London Research Ethics Committee. Findings will be published in a report to the Department for Education, in peer-reviewed journals and at conferences. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: ISRCTN17631228. PROTOCOL: V1 3 January 2019. Substantial changes to the protocol will be communicated to the trials manager to relevant parties (eg, ISRCTN).
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.