Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31481367›Full record

ArticleBMJ open2019

The Children and Young People's Health Partnership Evelina London Model of Care: process evaluation protocol.

Rose-Marie Satherley, Judith Green, Nick Sevdalis, James Joseph Newham, Mohamed Elsherbiny, Julia Forman, Ingrid Wolfe, Raghu Lingam, CYPHP team

Registry-linked trialAbstract readMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03461848 (The Children and Young People's Health Partnership), which is not on this map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT03461848 nacompletednot on this map

The Children and Young People's Health Partnership (CYPHP) Evelina London Model of Care: An Opportunistic Cluster Randomised Evaluation to Assess Child Health Outcomes, Healthcare Quality, and Health Service Use.

TypeinterventionalSponsorGuy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation TrustRan2018 to 2022Enrolled1,731ConditionsAsthma, Eczema, ConstipationArmsCYPHP Evelina London Model of care, Enhanced Usual Care
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Rose-Marie SatherleyDepartment of Women's and Children's Health, Kings College London, London, UK.
Judith GreenDepartment of Health Service and Population Research, Kings College London, London, UK.
Nick SevdalisDepartment of Population Health Sciences, Kings College London, London, UK.
James Joseph NewhamDepartment of Women's and Children's Health, Kings College London, London, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-3006-2125
Mohamed ElsherbinyDepartment of Health Service and Population Research, Kings College London, London, UK.
Julia FormanDepartment of Women's and Children's Health, Kings College London, London, UK.
Ingrid WolfeDepartment of Women's and Children's Health, Kings College London, London, UK.
Raghu LingamSchool of Women's and Children's Health, University of New South Wales, Sydney, Australia.
CYPHP team

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionChildren and young people (CYP) in the UK have poor health outcomes, and there is increasing emergency department and hospital outpatient use. To address these problems in Lambeth and Southwark (two boroughs of London, UK), the local Clinical Commissioning Groups, Local Authorities and Healthcare Providers formed The Children and Young People's Health Partnership (CYPHP), a clinical-academic programme for improving child health. The Partnership has developed the CYPHP Evelina London model, an integrated healthcare model that aims to deliver effective, coordinated care in primary and community settings and promote better self-management to over approximately 90 000 CYP in Lambeth and Southwark. This protocol is for the process evaluation of this model of care. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: Alongside an impact evaluation, an in-depth, mixed-methods process evaluation will be used to understand the barriers and facilitators to implementing the model of care. The data collected mapped onto a logic model of how CYPHP is expected to improve child health outcomes. Data collection and analysis include qualitative interviews and focus groups with stakeholders, a policy review and a quantitative analysis of routine clinical and administrative data and questionnaire data. Information relating to the context of the trial that may affect implementation and/or outcomes of the CYPHP model of care will be documented. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: The study has been reviewed by NHS REC Cornwall & Plymouth (17/SW/0275). The findings of this process evaluation will guide the scaling up and implementation of the CYPHP Evelina London Model of Care across the UK. Findings will be disseminated through publications and conferences, and implementation manuals and guidance for others working to improve child health through strengthening health systems. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT03461848.

Indexed as

Child HealthProgram EvaluationQualitative ResearchAdolescentChildHealth PersonnelHumansLondonProcess Assessment, Health CareSurveys and Questionnaireschild healthintegrated careprocess evaluation

Identifiers

PMID31481367
PMCPMC6731816

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.