Trial reportBMJ open2019
Improving cardiovascular disease risk communication in NHS Health Checks: a qualitative study.
Trial report in BMJ open, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT02486913 (Enhancing the Diagnosis and Prevention of Cardiovascular Disease in Newham by Integrated Use of Electronic Health Records), which is not on this map. Cited by 20 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Enhancing the Diagnosis and Prevention of Cardiovascular Disease in Newham by Integrated Use of Electronic Health Records
Who cites it
20 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Stakeholders' perceptions and experiences of factors influencing the commissioning, delivery, and uptake of general health checks: a qualitative evidence synthesis.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2025Pooled it
- Pooled it
- Black Parent's Perceptions of Discussing Cardiovascular Disease Risk with Primary Care Clinicians: a Qualitative Study.Journal of racial and ethnic health disparities · 2026Article
- Article
- The effectiveness of eHealth-based cardiovascular disease risk communication: a systematic review and meta-analysis.NPJ digital medicine · 2025Article
- Article
- Patient-physician communication of health and risk information in the management of cardiovascular diseases and diabetes: a systematic scoping review.BMC medicine · 2025Article
- Article
- A parallel-arm randomised control trial to study the effects of risk communication methods for prevention of cardiovascular diseases: EFFRICO trial.Journal of family medicine and primary care · 2024Article
- Article
- Association between any underlying health condition and COVID-19-associated hospitalization by age group, Washington State, 2020-2021: a retrospective cohort study.BMC infectious diseases · 2023Article
- The Impact and Perception of England's Web-Based Heart Age Test of Cardiovascular Disease Risk: Mixed Methods Study.JMIR cardio · 2023Article
- NHS Health Check programme: a rapid review update.BMJ open · 2022Review
- Cardiovascular disease risk communication in NHS Health Checks: a qualitative video-stimulated recall interview study with practitioners.BJGP open · 2021Article
- NHS Health Checks: an observational study of equity and outcomes 2009-2017.The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 2021Observational
- A qualitative exploration of two risk calculators using video-recorded NHS health check consultations.BMC family practice · 2020Article
- Fidelity of the delivery of NHS Health Checks in general practice: an observational study.BJGP open · 2020Article
- Article
- Lipid Management in Primary Care for Socioeconomically Disadvantaged Populations in Northern England: A Qualitative Study.Journal of primary care & community healthArticle
- Social Listening to Enhance Access to Appropriate Pandemic Information Among Culturally Diverse Populations: Case Study From Finland.JMIR infodemiologyArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectiveThe NHS Health Check programme is a public screening and prevention initiative in England to detect early signs of cardiovascular ill health among healthy adults. We aimed to explore patient perspectives and experiences of a personalised Risk Report designed to improve cardiovascular risk communication in the NHS Health Check. DESIGN AND
settingThis is a qualitative study with NHS Health Check attendees in three general practices in the London Borough of Newham. INTERVENTION AND
participantsA personalised Risk Report for the NHS Health Check was developed to improve communication of results and advice. The Risk Report was embedded in the electronic health record, printed with auto-filled results and used as a discussion aid during the NHS Health Check, and was a take-home record of information and advice on risk reduction for the attendees. 18 purposively sampled socially diverse participants took part in semistructured interviews, which were analysed thematically.
resultsFor most participants, the NHS Health Check was an opportunity for reassurance and assessment, and the Risk Report was an enduring record that supported risk understanding, with impact beyond the individual. For a minority, ambivalence towards the Risk Report occurred in the context of attending for other reasons, and risk and lifestyle advice were not internalised or acted on.
conclusionOur findings demonstrate the potential of a personalised Risk Report as a useful intervention in NHS Health Checks for enhancing patient understanding of cardiovascular risk and strategies for risk reduction. Also highlighted are the challenges that must be overcome to ensure transferability of these benefits to diverse patient groups. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT02486913.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.