Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31481075›Full record

SynthesisMalaria journal2019

Impact of Plasmodium falciparum malaria and intermittent preventive treatment of malaria in pregnancy on the risk of malaria in infants: a systematic review.

Abel Kakuru, Sarah G Staedke, Grant Dorsey, Stephen Rogerson, Daniel Chandramohan

Open access · goldAbstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Malaria journal, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
5.8field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 40 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Current update on malaria in pregnancy: a systematic review.Tropical diseases, travel medicine and vaccines · 2025
    Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 4 countries.

Abel KakuruInfectious Diseases Research Collaboration, P.O Box 7475, Kampala, Uganda. abelkakuru@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9941-1309
Sarah G StaedkeLondon School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, Keppel Street, London, WC1E 7HT, UK.
Grant DorseyUniversity of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA.
Stephen RogersonDepartment of Medicine at the Doherty Institute, University of Melbourne, 792 Elizabeth Street, Melbourne, VIC, 3000, Australia.
Daniel ChandramohanLondon School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, Keppel Street, London, WC1E 7HT, UK.
University of London · GBThe University of Melbourne · AUUniversity of California, San Francisco · US

Funding

The immunologic consequences of prenatal exposure to malariaP01HD059454 · NICHD · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO · PI HAVLIR, DIANE V · 2008 to 2017
$22.6M
NICHD NIH HHS P01 HD059454
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundStudies of the association between malaria in pregnancy (MiP) and malaria during infancy have provided mixed results. A systematic review was conducted to evaluate available evidence on the impact of Plasmodium falciparum malaria infection during pregnancy, and intermittent preventive treatment of malaria during pregnancy (IPTp), on the risk of clinical malaria or parasitaemia during infancy.

methodsMEDLINE, EMBASE, Global Health, and Malaria in Pregnancy Library databases were searched from inception to 22 May 2018 for articles published in English that reported on associations between MiP and malaria risk in infancy. Search terms included malaria, Plasmodium falciparum, pregnancy, placenta, maternal, prenatal, foetal, newborn, infant, child or offspring or preschool. Randomized controlled trials and prospective cohort studies, which followed infants for at least 6 months, were included if any of the following outcomes were reported: incidence of clinical malaria, prevalence of parasitaemia, and time to first episode of parasitaemia or clinical malaria. Substantial heterogeneity between studies precluded meta-analysis. Thus, a narrative synthesis of included studies was conducted.

resultsThe search yielded 14 published studies, 10 prospective cohort studies and four randomized trials; all were conducted in sub-Saharan Africa. Infants born to mothers with parasitaemia during pregnancy were at higher risk of malaria in three of four studies that assessed this association. Placental malaria detected by microscopy or histology was associated with a higher risk of malaria during infancy in nine of 12 studies, but only one study adjusted for malaria transmission intensity. No statistically significant associations between the use of IPTp or different IPTp regimens and the risk of malaria during infancy were identified.

conclusionEvidence of an association between MiP and IPTp and risk of malaria in infancy is limited and of variable quality. Most studies did not adequately adjust for malaria transmission intensity shared by mothers and their infants. Further research is needed to confirm or exclude an association between MiP and malaria in infancy. Randomized trials evaluating highly effective interventions aimed at preventing MiP, such as IPTp with dihydroartemisinin-piperaquine, may help to establish a causal association between MiP and malaria in infancy.

Indexed as

AntimalarialsChild, PreschoolFemaleHumansInfantInfant, NewbornMalaria, FalciparumMaleParasitemiaPlasmodium falciparumPregnancyPregnancy Complications, ParasiticRiskAntimalarialsInfantsIntermittent preventive treatmentMalariaPregnancy

Identifiers

PMID31481075
PMCPMC6724246
OpenAlexW2971520922

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.