ArticleBMC health services research2019
Can hospital accreditation enhance patient experience? Longitudinal evidence from a Hong Kong hospital patient experience survey.
Article in BMC health services research, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
18 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Organizational and Service Management Interventions for Improving the Patient Experience With Care: Systematic Review of the Effectiveness.The International journal of health planning and management · 2025Pooled it
- The impact of hospital accreditation on the quality of healthcare: a systematic literature review.BMC health services research · 2021Pooled it
- Mediators of change in healthcare organisations subject to external assessment: a systematic review with narrative synthesis.BMJ open · 2020Pooled it
- [Centralization of liver surgery in Germany].Chirurgie (Heidelberg, Germany) · 2026Review
- Patient experience with cancer care in low- and middle-income Asian countries: a cross-sectional study of patients with advanced cancer.BMJ global health · 2025Article
- Nursing perception towards the impact of JCI accreditation on the quality of care in a university hospital in Palestine: a cross-sectional study.BMC nursing · 2024Article
- Article
- Accreditation of Quality in Primary Health Care in Chile: Perception of the Teams from Accredited Family Healthcare Centers.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2023Article
- Effects of Health Insurance on Quality of Care in Low-Income Countries: A Systematic Review.Public health reviews · 2023Review
- Use of Patient-Reported Data within the Acute Healthcare Context: A Scoping Review.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022Article
- Impact of accreditation on health care services performance in Kiryandongo district, Uganda: a longitudinal study.BMC health services research · 2022Article
- Developing a hospital accreditation model: a Delphi study.BMC health services research · 2021Review
- Facebook Reviews as a Supplemental Tool for Hospital Patient Satisfaction and Its Relationship with Hospital Accreditation in Malaysia.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2021Article
- Perception of Hospital Accreditation Impact among Quality Management Professionals in India: A Survey-Based Multicenter Study.Global journal on quality and safety in healthcare · 2021Article
- The Psychological Impact of the Tertiary Hospital Reappraisal on Resident Doctors in the Post-pandemic Era: A Cross-sectional Study in Ningbo.Frontiers in psychiatry · 2021Article
- Testing the Strength of Hospital Accreditation as a Signal of the Quality of Care in Romania: Do Patients' and Health Professionals' Perceptions Align?Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2020Article
- Attitudes Towards Accreditation and Quality Improvement Activities Among Hospital Employees in Iran: A Quantitative Study.Journal of multidisciplinary healthcare · 2020Article
- Assessing the Presence of the Joint Commission International Accreditation Requirements in Western Saudi Arabia Hospital Pharmacies: A Cross-sectional Study.Journal of research in pharmacy practiceArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundHospital accreditation is expected to improve health care quality and patient satisfaction. However, little and conflicting evidence is currently available to support its effect on patient outcomes, particularly patient experience. Hong Kong recently launched a pilot programme to test an infrastructure for accreditation of both private and public hospitals with the Australian Council on Healthcare Standards. This study aims to evaluate the longitudinal impact of hospital accreditation on patient experience in a publicly-funded university teaching hospital in Hong Kong.
methodsThree cross-sectional surveys were conducted at three time points: 9 months pre- accreditation as baseline (T1), three (T2) and fifteen months (T3) post-accreditation. Acute care inpatients aged 18 to 80 were recruited on the second day of hospital admission to complete the Picker Patient Experience Questionnaire-15 (PPE-15). Baseline data was first compared to the 2005 Hong Kong average for public hospitals using t-tests. Data was then analyzed using ANOVA and multiple linear regression to evaluate differences across the three cross-sections and examine the effect of accreditation over time while controlling for covariates.
results3083 patients (T1 = 896, T2 = 1093, T3 = 1094) completed the survey for a response rate of 83.5, 86.1, and 83.8%, respectively. The hospital baseline domain and summary patient experience scores differed from the Hong Kong public hospital average obtained from the 2005 Thematic Household Survey. All domain and summary patient experience scores declined (improved) over the study period (T1 to T3). The multiple regression results confirmed the time point score comparisons with declining (improving) parameter estimates for T2 and T3 for all domain and summary scores except the 'continuity and transition' domain, for which the declining coefficient was only significant at T3.
conclusionsWhile hospital accreditation has not been shown to improve patient outcomes, this study suggests the accreditation exercise may enhance patient experience. Moreover, it suggests the quality improvement initiatives associated with accreditation may address areas of concern emphasized by Hong Kong patients, such as involvement in care and emotional support from providers.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.