Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31481058›Full record

ArticleBMC health services research2019

Can hospital accreditation enhance patient experience? Longitudinal evidence from a Hong Kong hospital patient experience survey.

Ellie Bostwick Andres, Wen Song, Wei Song, Janice Mary Johnston

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC health services research, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. [Centralization of liver surgery in Germany].Chirurgie (Heidelberg, Germany) · 2026
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Use of Patient-Reported Data within the Acute Healthcare Context: A Scoping Review.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Ellie Bostwick AndresUniveristy of Hong Kong, School of Public Health, Patrick Manson Building, (North Wing), 7 Sassoon Road, Pokfulam, Hong Kong. eandres@hku.hk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9086-8222
Wen SongUniveristy of Hong Kong, School of Public Health, Patrick Manson Building, (North Wing), 7 Sassoon Road, Pokfulam, Hong Kong.
Wei SongUniveristy of Hong Kong, School of Public Health, Patrick Manson Building, (North Wing), 7 Sassoon Road, Pokfulam, Hong Kong.
Janice Mary JohnstonUniveristy of Hong Kong, School of Public Health, Patrick Manson Building, (North Wing), 7 Sassoon Road, Pokfulam, Hong Kong.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundHospital accreditation is expected to improve health care quality and patient satisfaction. However, little and conflicting evidence is currently available to support its effect on patient outcomes, particularly patient experience. Hong Kong recently launched a pilot programme to test an infrastructure for accreditation of both private and public hospitals with the Australian Council on Healthcare Standards. This study aims to evaluate the longitudinal impact of hospital accreditation on patient experience in a publicly-funded university teaching hospital in Hong Kong.

methodsThree cross-sectional surveys were conducted at three time points: 9 months pre- accreditation as baseline (T1), three (T2) and fifteen months (T3) post-accreditation. Acute care inpatients aged 18 to 80 were recruited on the second day of hospital admission to complete the Picker Patient Experience Questionnaire-15 (PPE-15). Baseline data was first compared to the 2005 Hong Kong average for public hospitals using t-tests. Data was then analyzed using ANOVA and multiple linear regression to evaluate differences across the three cross-sections and examine the effect of accreditation over time while controlling for covariates.

results3083 patients (T1 = 896, T2 = 1093, T3 = 1094) completed the survey for a response rate of 83.5, 86.1, and 83.8%, respectively. The hospital baseline domain and summary patient experience scores differed from the Hong Kong public hospital average obtained from the 2005 Thematic Household Survey. All domain and summary patient experience scores declined (improved) over the study period (T1 to T3). The multiple regression results confirmed the time point score comparisons with declining (improving) parameter estimates for T2 and T3 for all domain and summary scores except the 'continuity and transition' domain, for which the declining coefficient was only significant at T3.

conclusionsWhile hospital accreditation has not been shown to improve patient outcomes, this study suggests the accreditation exercise may enhance patient experience. Moreover, it suggests the quality improvement initiatives associated with accreditation may address areas of concern emphasized by Hong Kong patients, such as involvement in care and emotional support from providers.

Indexed as

Patient SatisfactionAccreditationAdolescentAdultAgedAged, 80 and overEpidemiologic MethodsFemaleHong KongHospitalizationHospitals, PublicHospitals, TeachingHumansInpatientsMaleMiddle AgedAccreditationExternal quality assessmentHospital medicinePatient satisfaction

Identifiers

PMID31481058
PMCPMC6724298

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.