Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31481018›Full record

ArticleBMC microbiology2019

Quantitative methods for assessing local and bodywide contributions to Wolbachia titer in maternal germline cells of Drosophila.

Steen Christensen, Moises Camacho, Zinat Sharmin, A J M Zehadee Momtaz, Laura Perez, Giselle Navarro, Jairo Triana, Hani Samarah, Michael Turelli, Laura R Serbus

Abstract readEvaluation Study
In one paragraph

Article in BMC microbiology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Counting rareMicrobiology spectrum · 2025
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Comparative analysis ofbioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2024
    Article
  6. Non-ovarianmicroPublication biology · 2024
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. The cellular lives of Wolbachia.Nature reviews. Microbiology · 2023
    Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Bt, Not a Threat toFrontiers in physiology · 2020
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Steen ChristensenDepartment of Biological Sciences, Florida International University, Miami, FL, 33199, USA.
Moises CamachoDepartment of Biological Sciences, Florida International University, Miami, FL, 33199, USA.
Zinat SharminDepartment of Biological Sciences, Florida International University, Miami, FL, 33199, USA.
A J M Zehadee MomtazDepartment of Biological Sciences, Florida International University, Miami, FL, 33199, USA.
Laura PerezDepartment of Biological Sciences, Florida International University, Miami, FL, 33199, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-3998-8071
Giselle NavarroDepartment of Biological Sciences, Florida International University, Miami, FL, 33199, USA.
Jairo TrianaDepartment of Biological Sciences, Florida International University, Miami, FL, 33199, USA.
Hani SamarahDepartment of Biological Sciences, Florida International University, Miami, FL, 33199, USA.
Michael TurelliDepartment of Evolution and Ecology, University of California, Davis, Davis, CA, 95616, USA.
Laura R SerbusDepartment of Biological Sciences, Florida International University, Miami, FL, 33199, USA. Lserbus@fiu.edu.

Funding

Evolution of interactions between Wolbachia and its hosts: Drosophila model systeR01GM104325 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA AT DAVIS · PI TURELLI, MICHAEL · 2013 to 2016
$1.6M
NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM104325
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundLittle is known about how bacterial endosymbionts colonize host tissues. Because many insect endosymbionts are maternally transmitted, egg colonization is critical for endosymbiont success. Wolbachia bacteria, carried by approximately half of all insect species, provide an excellent model for characterizing endosymbiont infection dynamics. To date, technical limitations have precluded stepwise analysis of germline colonization by Wolbachia. It is not clear to what extent titer-altering effects are primarily mediated by growth rates of Wolbachia within cell lineages or migration of Wolbachia between cells.

resultsThe objective of this work is to inform mechanisms of germline colonization through use of optimized methodology. The approaches are framed in terms of nutritional impacts on Wolbachia. Yeast-rich diets in particular have been shown to suppress Wolbachia titer in the Drosophila melanogaster germline. To determine the extent of Wolbachia sensitivity to diet, we optimized 3-dimensional, multi-stage quantification of Wolbachia titer in maternal germline cells. Technical and statistical validation confirmed the identity of Wolbachia in vivo, the reproducibility of Wolbachia quantification and the statistical power to detect these effects. The data from adult feeding experiments demonstrated that germline Wolbachia titer is distinctly sensitive to yeast-rich host diets in late oogenesis. To investigate the physiological basis for these nutritional impacts, we optimized methodology for absolute Wolbachia quantification by real-time qPCR. We found that yeast-rich diets exerted no significant effect on bodywide Wolbachia titer, although ovarian titers were significantly reduced. This suggests that host diets affects Wolbachia distribution between the soma and late stage germline cells. Notably, relative qPCR methods distorted apparent wsp abundance, due to altered host DNA copy number in yeast-rich conditions. This highlights the importance of absolute quantification data for testing mechanistic hypotheses.

conclusionsWe demonstrate that absolute quantification of Wolbachia, using well-controlled cytological and qPCR-based methods, creates new opportunities to determine how bacterial abundance within the germline relates to bacterial distribution within the body. This methodology can be applied to further test germline infection dynamics in response to chemical treatments, genetic conditions, new host/endosymbiont combinations, or potentially adapted to analyze other cell and tissue types.

Indexed as

Animal FeedAnimalsCytological TechniquesDrosophila melanogasterFemaleOvaryOvumPolymerase Chain ReactionWolbachiaColonizationDrosophilaEndosymbiontGermlineImagingOogenesisqPCRQuantificationTiterWolbachia

Identifiers

PMID31481018
PMCPMC6724367

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.