Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31480972›Full record

ArticleProceedings. Biological sciences2019

Meiotic drive reduces egg-to-adult viability in stalk-eyed flies.

Sam Ronan Finnegan, Nathan Joseph White, Dixon Koh, M Florencia Camus, Kevin Fowler, Andrew Pomiankowski

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings. Biological sciences, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
3.4field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 26 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. The metabolic costs of meiotic drive.Proceedings. Biological sciences · 2025
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Resistance to natural and synthetic gene drive systems.Journal of evolutionary biology · 2020
    Review
  11. Ancient gene drives: an evolutionary paradox.Proceedings. Biological sciences · 2019
    Article
  12. Fitness consequences of a non-recombiningProceedings. Biological sciences · 2019
    Article
  13. Gene drive: progress and prospects.Proceedings. Biological sciences · 2019
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Sam Ronan FinneganDepartment of Genetics, Evolution and Environment, University College London, Gower Street, London WC1E 6BT, UK.
Nathan Joseph WhiteDepartment of Genetics, Evolution and Environment, University College London, Gower Street, London WC1E 6BT, UK.
Dixon KohDepartment of Genetics, Evolution and Environment, University College London, Gower Street, London WC1E 6BT, UK.
M Florencia CamusDepartment of Genetics, Evolution and Environment, University College London, Gower Street, London WC1E 6BT, UK.
Kevin FowlerDepartment of Genetics, Evolution and Environment, University College London, Gower Street, London WC1E 6BT, UK.
Andrew PomiankowskiDepartment of Genetics, Evolution and Environment, University College London, Gower Street, London WC1E 6BT, UK.
University College London · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A number of species are affected by Sex-Ratio (SR) meiotic drive, a selfish genetic element located on the X-chromosome that causes dysfunction of Y-bearing sperm. SR is transmitted to up to 100% of offspring, causing extreme sex ratio bias. SR in several species is found in a stable polymorphism at a moderate frequency, suggesting there must be strong frequency-dependent selection resisting its spread. We investigate the effect of SR on female and male egg-to-adult viability in the Malaysian stalk-eyed fly, Teleopsis dalmanni. SR meiotic drive in this species is old, and appears to be broadly stable at a moderate (approx. 20%) frequency. We use large-scale controlled crosses to estimate the strength of selection acting against SR in female and male carriers. We find that SR reduces the egg-to-adult viability of both sexes. In females, homozygous females experience greater reduction in viability (s

Indexed as

EyeMeiosisSex RatioAnimalsDipteraFemaleMalePolymorphism, GeneticSpermatozoaX Chromosomemeiotic driveselfish genetic elementsex ratiosexual selectionstalk-eyed flyTeleopsis

Identifiers

PMID31480972
PMCPMC6742991
OpenAlexW2972034895

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.