Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31480758›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of molecular sciences2019

The Role of Extracellular Matrix Expression, ERK1/2 Signaling and Cell Cohesiveness for Cartilage Yield from iPSCs.

Justyna Buchert, Solvig Diederichs, Ursula Kreuser, Christian Merle, Wiltrud Richter

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of molecular sciences, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. SIRT1 activity orchestrates ECM expression during hESC-chondrogenic differentiation.FASEB journal : official publication of the Federation of American Societies for Experimental Biology · 2022
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Extracellular Vesicles in Musculoskeletal Pathologies and Regeneration.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2020
    Review
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Justyna BuchertResearch Center for Experimental Orthopaedics, Heidelberg University Hospital, Schlierbacher Landstr. 200a, 69118 Heidelberg, Germany.
Solvig DiederichsResearch Center for Experimental Orthopaedics, Heidelberg University Hospital, Schlierbacher Landstr. 200a, 69118 Heidelberg, Germany.
Ursula KreuserResearch Center for Experimental Orthopaedics, Heidelberg University Hospital, Schlierbacher Landstr. 200a, 69118 Heidelberg, Germany.
Christian MerleCenter of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery, Heidelberg University Hospital, Schlierbacher Landstr. 200a, 69118 Heidelberg, Germany.
Wiltrud RichterResearch Center for Experimental Orthopaedics, Heidelberg University Hospital, Schlierbacher Landstr. 200a, 69118 Heidelberg, Germany. wiltrud.richter@med.uni-heidelberg.de.

Funding

Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft DI1684/4-1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Current therapies involving chondrocytes or mesenchymal stromal cells (MSCs) remain inefficient in restoring cartilage properties upon injury. The induced pluripotent stem-cell (iPSC)-derived mesenchymal progenitor cells (iMPCs) have been put forward as a promising alternative cell source due to their high proliferation and differentiation potential. However, the observed cell loss during in vitro chondrogenesis is currently a bottleneck in establishing articular chondrocyte generation from iPSCs. In a search for candidate mechanisms underlying the low iPSC-derived cartilage tissue yield, global transcriptomes were compared between iMPCs and MSCs and the cell properties were analyzed via a condensation assay. The iMPCs had a more juvenile mesenchymal gene signature than MSCs with less myofibroblast-like characteristics, including significantly lower ECM- and integrin-ligand-related as well as lower α-smooth-muscle-actin expression. This correlated with less substrate and more cell-cell adhesion, impaired aggregate formation and consequently inferior cohesive tissue properties of the iMPC-pellets. Along lower expression of pro-survival ECM molecules, like decorin, collagen VI, lumican and laminin, the iMPC populations had significantly less active ERK1/2 compared to MSCs. Overall, this study proposes that this ECM and integrin-ligand shortage, together with insufficient pro-survival ERK1/2-activity, explains the loss of a non-aggregating iMPC sub-fraction during pellet formation and reduced survival of cells in early pellets. Enhancing ECM production and related signaling in iMPCs may be a promising new means to enrich the instructive microenvironment with pro-survival cues allowing to improve the final cartilage tissue yield from iPSCs.

Indexed as

MAP Kinase Signaling SystemBiomarkersCartilage, ArticularCell AggregationChondrogenesisDNAExtracellular MatrixGene Expression RegulationHumansInduced Pluripotent Stem CellsMesenchymal Stem CellsPhosphorylationSignal TransductionBiomarkersDNAcartilage regenerationERK1/2 signalingextracellular matrixinduced pluripotent stem cellsmesenchymal stromal cells

Identifiers

PMID31480758
PMCPMC6747490

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.