Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31480565›Full record

ReviewInsects2019

Non-Entomopathogenic Roles of Entomopathogenic Fungi in Promoting Plant Health and Growth.

Surendra K Dara

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Insects, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Endophytic entomopathogenic fungi: The next frontier in mycological biocontrol.World journal of microbiology & biotechnology · 2026
    Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Plants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023
    Article
  12. Isolation of a highly virulentFrontiers in microbiology · 2023
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. EndophyticJournal of nematology · 2021
    Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Interactions ofInsects · 2020
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Surendra K DaraDivision of Agriculture and Natural Resources, University of California Cooperative Extension, San Luis Obispo, CA 93401, USA. skdara@ucdavis.edu.ORCID 0000-0002-4542-7206

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Multiple genera of hypocrealean fungi infect and kill a wide variety of arthropod pests. Several formulations based on these soilborne fungi are commercially available as biopesticides for controlling urban, garden, greenhouse, and agricultural pests. These fungi are an important part of integrated pest management strategies to maintain pest control efficacy, reduce the risk of chemical insecticide resistance, and offer environmentally sustainable pest suppression. While the entomopathogenic or pest management role of these fungi is well documented, several studies in the past decade or two have provided insights into their relationship with plants, soil, and plant pathogens, and their additional roles in promoting plant growth and health. This review highlights these endophytic, mycorrhiza-like, and disease-antagonizing roles of entomopathogenic fungi.

Indexed as

Beauveriaendophyteentomopathogenic fungiIsariaMetarhiziummycorrhiza-likesystemic resistance

Identifiers

PMID31480565
PMCPMC6780571

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.