Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31480456›Full record

ArticleCancers2019

Analysing Tumour Growth Delay Data from Animal Irradiation Experiments with Deviations from the Prescribed Dose.

Leonhard Karsch, Elke Beyreuther, Doreen Eger Passos, Jörg Pawelke, Steffen Löck

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cancers, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
1.8field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Leonhard KarschHelmholtz-Zentrum Dresden-Rossendorf, Institute of Radiooncology-OncoRay, 01328 Dresden, Germany. Leonhard.Karsch@oncoray.de.
Elke BeyreutherOncoRay-National Center for Radiation Research in Oncology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden-Rossendorf, 01328 Dresden, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-0582-1444
Doreen Eger PassosOncoRay-National Center for Radiation Research in Oncology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden-Rossendorf, 01328 Dresden, Germany.
Jörg PawelkeHelmholtz-Zentrum Dresden-Rossendorf, Institute of Radiooncology-OncoRay, 01328 Dresden, Germany.
Steffen LöckOncoRay-National Center for Radiation Research in Oncology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden-Rossendorf, 01328 Dresden, Germany.
Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden-Rossendorf · DEGerman Cancer Research Center · DE

Funding

Bundesministerium für Bildung und Forschung 03ZIK445, 03Z1N511 and 03Z1O511
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The development of new radiotherapy technologies is a long-term process, which requires proof of the general concept. However, clinical requirements with respect to beam quality and controlled dose delivery may not yet be fulfilled. Exemplarily, the necessary radiobiological experiments with laser-accelerated electrons are challenged by fluctuating beam intensities. Based on tumour-growth data and dose values obtained in an in vivo trial comparing the biological efficacy of laser-driven and conventional clinical Linac electrons, different statistical approaches for analysis were compared. In addition to the classical averaging per dose point, which excludes animals with high dose deviations, multivariable linear regression, Cox regression and a Monte-Carlo-based approach were tested as alternatives that include all animals in statistical analysis. The four methods were compared based on experimental and simulated data. All applied statistical approaches revealed a comparable radiobiological efficacy of laser-driven and conventional Linac electrons, confirming the experimental conclusion. In the simulation study, significant differences in dose response were detected by all methods except for the conventional method, which showed the lowest power. Thereby, the alternative statistical approaches may allow for reducing the total number of required animals in future pre-clinical trials.

Indexed as

experimental beamspre-clinical studiesradiotherapystatistical analysis

Identifiers

PMID31480456
PMCPMC6769440
OpenAlexW2970311904

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.