ArticlePharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland)2019
Phenolic Plant Extracts Versus Penicillin G: In Vitro Susceptibility of
Article in Pharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland), 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.
- Bovine mastitis, a worldwide impact disease: Prevalence, antimicrobial resistance, and viable alternative approaches.Veterinary and animal science · 2023Review
- Identification of Antibacterial Components and Modes in the Methanol-Phase Extract from a Herbal PlantFoods (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- Article
- Synergistic Antibacterial and Anti-inflammatory Activities ofAntibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Article
- Antimicrobial photodynamic therapy (aPDT) for biofilm treatments. Possible synergy between aPDT and pulsed electric fields.Virulence · 2021Review
- Nanomaterials and Essential Oils as Candidates for Developing Novel Treatment Options for Bovine Mastitis.Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2021Review
- Bovine mastitis prevention and control in the post-antibiotic era.Tropical animal health and production · 2021Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Antibiotics are the elective drugs in bovine mastitis (BM) treatment, despite their low rates of efficiency and effectiveness and increasing risk of pathogen resistance. In this sense, it is urgent to discover new and effective antimicrobial agents to apply in BM control and even treatment. Plant extracts have been widely recognized as a rich source of phytochemicals with antimicrobial potential. Thus, the present work aims to compare the bioactivity of
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.