Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31480301›Full record

ArticleMicromachines2019

Micro-Macro: Selective Integration of Microfeatures Inside Low-Cost Macromolds for PDMS Microfluidics Fabrication.

Edgar Jiménez-Díaz, Mariel Cano-Jorge, Diego Zamarrón-Hernández, Lucia Cabriales, Francisco Páez-Larios, Aarón Cruz-Ramírez, Genaro Vázquez-Victorio, Tatiana Fiordelisio, Mathieu Hautefeuille

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Micromachines, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Augmented 3D Printing for Multiscale Microphysiological Systems.Small (Weinheim an der Bergstrasse, Germany) · 2025
    Review
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Oncoimmunology Meets Organs-on-Chip.Frontiers in molecular biosciences · 2021
    Review
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Edgar Jiménez-DíazFacultad de Ciencias, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, CDMX 04510, Mexico.ORCID 0000-0002-7456-6010
Mariel Cano-JorgeFacultad de Ciencias, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, CDMX 04510, Mexico.
Diego Zamarrón-HernándezFacultad de Ciencias, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, CDMX 04510, Mexico.ORCID 0000-0002-8315-5504
Lucia CabrialesFacultad de Ciencias, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, CDMX 04510, Mexico.
Francisco Páez-LariosFacultad de Ciencias, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, CDMX 04510, Mexico.ORCID 0000-0002-4286-9180
Aarón Cruz-RamírezFacultad de Ciencias, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, CDMX 04510, Mexico.
Genaro Vázquez-VictorioFacultad de Ciencias, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, CDMX 04510, Mexico.ORCID 0000-0002-2319-8772
Tatiana FiordelisioFacultad de Ciencias, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, CDMX 04510, Mexico. tfiorde@ciencias.unam.mx.
Mathieu HautefeuilleFacultad de Ciencias, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, CDMX 04510, Mexico. mathieu_h@ciencias.unam.mx.ORCID 0000-0003-3918-0320

Funding

Consejo Nacional de Ciencia y Tecnología 272894Consejo Nacional de Ciencia y Tecnología 289685Dirección General de Asuntos del Personal Académico, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México IT102017
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Microfluidics has become a very promising technology in recent years, due to its great potential to revolutionize life-science solutions. Generic microfabrication processes have been progressively made available to academic laboratories thanks to cost-effective soft-lithography techniques and enabled important progress in applications like lab-on-chip platforms using rapid- prototyping. However, micron-sized features are required in most designs, especially in biomimetic cell culture platforms, imposing elevated costs of production associated with lithography and limiting the use of such devices. In most cases, however, only a small portion of the structures require high-resolution and cost may be decreased. In this work, we present a replica-molding method separating the fabrication steps of low (macro) and high (micro) resolutions and then merging the two scales in a single chip. The method consists of fabricating the largest possible area in inexpensive macromolds using simple techniques such as plastics micromilling, laser microfabrication, or even by shrinking printed polystyrene sheets. The microfeatures were made on a separated mold or onto existing macromolds using photolithography or 2-photon lithography. By limiting the expensive area to the essential, the time and cost of fabrication can be reduced. Polydimethylsiloxane (PDMS) microfluidic chips were successfully fabricated from the constructed molds and tested to validate our micro-macro method.

Indexed as

microfabricationmicrofluidicssoft lithography

Identifiers

PMID31480301
PMCPMC6780727

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.