Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31480245›Full record

Trial reportNutrients2019

Evaluation of the Influence of Raw Almonds on Appetite Control: Satiation, Satiety, Hedonics and Consumer Perceptions.

Sophie Hollingworth, Michelle Dalton, John E Blundell, Graham Finlayson

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Nutrients, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT02480582 (The Impact of Snacks Which Vary Nutritionally in Their Satiating Potential on Measures of Appetite Control), which is not on this map. Cited by 12 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.7field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT02480582 nacompletednot on this map

The Impact of Snacks Which Vary Nutritionally in Their Satiating Potential on Measures of Appetite Control

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity of LeedsRan2015 to 2015Enrolled42ConditionsLack of Satiety, HyperphagiaArmsAlmonds, Cheese Savouries
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 23 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Sophie HollingworthAppetite Control and Energy Balance Research, School of Psychology, University of Leeds, Leeds LS2 9JT, UK.
Michelle DaltonSchool of Social and Health Sciences, Leeds Trinity University, LS18 5HD, Leeds LS18 5HD, UK. m.dalton@leedstrinity.ac.uk.
John E BlundellAppetite Control and Energy Balance Research, School of Psychology, University of Leeds, Leeds LS2 9JT, UK.
Graham FinlaysonAppetite Control and Energy Balance Research, School of Psychology, University of Leeds, Leeds LS2 9JT, UK. g.s.finlayson@leeds.ac.uk.ORCID 0000-0002-5620-2256
University of Leeds · GBLeeds Trinity University · GB

Funding

Almond Board of California N/A
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Snack foods can be substantial contributors to daily energy intake, with different types of snacks exerting potentially different effects on satiety per calorie consumed. The present research compared the effect of consuming almonds as a mid-morning snack compared to an energy and weight-matched comparator snack (savoury crackers) or the equivalent weight of water (zero energy control). In a crossover design, 42 female participants (age: 26.0 ± 7.9, BMI: 22.0 ± 2.0) consumed a fixed breakfast then a mid-morning snack. Appetite, 24-h energy intake, food hedonics, and consumer perceptions of the snack foods were assessed under laboratory conditions. AUC analyses revealed a lower overall hunger drive after consuming almonds compared to crackers or water. There was no difference in 24-h energy intake in the almond compared to the cracker or the zero-energy control condition, however participants consumed more energy in the cracker condition compared to the zero-energy control condition. In addition, almonds suppressed hedonic preference (implicit wanting) for consuming high-fat foods and demonstrated a higher satiety quotient (SQ) than crackers. Almonds were perceived to have a more favourable consumer profile aligned with successful weight management. In conclusion, these findings demonstrate that in the context of a 24-h period of objectively measured energy intake, raw almonds are effective for controlling appetite compared to an energy matched alternative snack. This trial was registered at clinicaltrials.gov [NCT02480582].

Indexed as

AppetitePhilosophyPrunus dulcisSatiationAdultArea Under CurveBody Mass IndexBody WeightBreakfastCross-Over StudiesEnergy IntakeFemaleHumansHungerPerceptionRaw Foodsalmondsappetiteenergy intakesatietysnack

Identifiers

PMID31480245
PMCPMC6769453
OpenAlexW2970340113

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.