Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31480201›Full record

ArticleAsian-Australasian journal of animal sciences2019

Comparison of genomic predictions for carcass and reproduction traits in Berkshire, Duroc and Yorkshire populations in Korea.

Asif Iqbal, Tae-Jeong Choi, You-Sam Kim, Yun-Mi Lee, M Zahangir Alam, Jong-Hyun Jung, Ho-Sung Choe, Jong-Joo Kim

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Asian-Australasian journal of animal sciences, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Asif IqbalDepartment of Biotechnology, Yeungnam University, Gyeongsan 38541, Korea.
Tae-Jeong ChoiSwine Science Division, National Institute of Animal Science, RDA, Wanju 55365, Korea.
You-Sam KimDepartment of Biotechnology, Yeungnam University, Gyeongsan 38541, Korea.
Yun-Mi LeeDepartment of Biotechnology, Yeungnam University, Gyeongsan 38541, Korea.
M Zahangir AlamDepartment of Biotechnology, Yeungnam University, Gyeongsan 38541, Korea.
Jong-Hyun JungJung P&C Institute, Seoul 16950, Korea.
Ho-Sung ChoeDepartment of Animal Biotechnology, Chonbuk National University, Jeonju 54896, Korea.
Jong-Joo KimDepartment of Biotechnology, Yeungnam University, Gyeongsan 38541, Korea.

Funding

Rural Development Administration PJ01108301
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveA genome-based best linear unbiased prediction (GBLUP) method was applied to evaluate accuracies of genomic estimated breeding value (GEBV) of carcass and reproductive traits in Berkshire, Duroc and Yorkshire populations in Korean swine breeding farms.

methodsThe data comprised a total of 1,870, 696, and 1,723 genotyped pigs belonging to Berkshire, Duroc and Yorkshire breeds, respectively. Reference populations for carcass traits consisted of 888 Berkshire, 466 Duroc, and 1,208 Yorkshire pigs, and those for reproductive traits comprised 210, 154, and 890 dams for the respective breeds. The carcass traits analyzed were backfat thickness (BFT) and carcass weight (CWT), and the reproductive traits were total number born (TNB) and number born alive (NBA). For each trait, GEBV accuracies were evaluated with a GEBV BLUP model and realized GEBVs.

resultsThe accuracies under the GBLUP model for BFT and CWT ranged from 0.33-0.72 and 0.33-0.63, respectively. For NBA and TNB, the model accuracies ranged 0.32 to 0.54 and 0.39 to 0.56, respectively. The realized accuracy estimates for BFT and CWT ranged 0.30 to 0.46 and 0.09 to 0.27, respectively, and 0.50 to 0.70 and 0.70 to 0.87 for NBA and TNB, respectively. For the carcass traits, the GEBV accuracies under the GBLUP model were higher than the realized GEBV accuracies across the breed populations, while for reproductive traits the realized accuracies were higher than the model based GEBV accuracies.

conclusionThe genomic prediction accuracy increased with reference population size and heritability of the trait. The GEBV accuracies were also influenced by GEBV estimation method, such that careful selection of animals based on the estimated GEBVs is needed. GEBV accuracy will increase with a larger sized reference population, which would be more beneficial for traits with low heritability such as reproductive traits.

Indexed as

Carcass TraitsGenomic Best Linear Unbiased Prediction (GBLUP)Genomic Estimated Breeding Value (GEBV)Genomic SelectionPigReproduction Traits

Identifiers

PMID31480201
PMCPMC6817783

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.