Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31480075›Full record

ArticleJournal of vision2019

The upper disparity limit increases gradually with eccentricity.

Saeideh Ghahghaei, Suzanne McKee, Preeti Verghese

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of vision, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
0.7field-weighted citation impact, top 30% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Stereopsis without correspondence.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2023
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Predicting Stereopsis in Macular Degeneration.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2020
    Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Saeideh GhahghaeiThe Smith-Kettlewell Eye Research Institute, San Francisco, CA, USA.
Suzanne McKeeThe Smith-Kettlewell Eye Research Institute, San Francisco, CA, USA.
Preeti VergheseThe Smith-Kettlewell Eye Research Institute, San Francisco, CA, USA.
Smith-Kettlewell Eye Research Institute · US

Funding

Maximizing Visual Potential in Age-Related Macular DegenerationR01EY027390 · NEI · SMITH-KETTLEWELL EYE RESEARCH INSTITUTE · PI Preeti Verghese · 2017 to 2026
$5.7M
NEI NIH HHS R01 EY027390
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Stereopsis is important for tasks of daily living such as eye-hand coordination. It is best in central vision but is also mediated by the periphery. Previously we have shown that individuals with central-field loss who have residual stereopsis in the periphery perform better at an eye-hand-coordination task when they perform the task binocularly rather than monocularly. Here we seek to determine what sets the limit of stereopsis, defined as the largest disparity that supports the sustained appearance of depth, in the near periphery in healthy individuals. While stereoacuity thresholds increase sharply with eccentricity, Panum's area increases much more slowly. We used a rigorous method to determine the uppermost limit of disparity. At long durations, the two half-images that define a large disparity appear as two isolated targets in the same flat plane; small incremental changes in disparity produce changes in the separation between the half-images, and disparity magnitude can be judged on the basis of separation, like a monocular width judgment. The disparity limit is the point at which the threshold for judging dichoptic separation between the half-images is equal to the monocular width-discrimination threshold. The disparity limit at 10° was a factor of 2-4 times larger than the fovea, regardless of the meridian tested. The increase in the disparity limit with eccentricity was shallow, similar to that of Panum's area. Within this disparity limit, disparity increment thresholds were comparable for foveal and peripheral targets, illustrating the significance and utility of peripheral stereopsis, especially in the absence of foveal stereopsis.

Indexed as

Depth PerceptionFixation, OcularFovea CentralisHumansPhotic StimulationPsychomotor PerformanceVision, BinocularVision DisparityVision, OcularVisual Acuity

Identifiers

PMID31480075
PMCPMC6724556
OpenAlexW2972251860

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.